We participate in architectural competitions to maintain strengths in creative and critical design practices. Within the workforce it’s often easy to get bogged down and focused on the practicalities of everyday design. We wish to be not only architects that can see a building through its construction, but also designers that can create a piece of architecture through study and research.

Architecture competitions are not only opportunities for recognition, but also occasions to deepen our design approach, strengthen collaboration, and evaluate our work within a broader cultural and architectural discourse. By participating in architectural competitions, we are offered a valuable space for experimentation, research, and critical thinking, allowing us to challenge ourselves beyond the limits of everyday practice, develop ideas, and engage with architectural questions in a more open and exploratory way, helping us grow as architects. Among all competitions, it is especially important for us to engage with those whose criteria align with our professional interests and values. We deeply believe that the approach promoted by this competition can help meaningful ideas take shape and contribute to creating a better world.

In professional practice, architecture is often shaped by multiple constraints such as budget limitations, regulatory frameworks, and the expectations of clients and local authorities. These parameters are essential, but they can sometimes restrict the exploration of more experimental or unconventional ideas. Participating in architecture competitions, especially ideas competitions, offers a different space. It allows me to step outside these constraints and explore architecture as a field of research and speculation. It is an opportunity to test new approaches, challenge assumptions, and push my creativity further than what is usually possible in everyday practice. Competitions also allow me to position myself critically—towards the city, towards current building practices, and towards the role of architecture itself. They become a platform to propose alternative visions, question existing models, and imagine more ambitious or sensitive responses to contemporary challenges.

Above all, it is a pretext to give us the opportunity to reflect on themes that interest us and to experiment freely, helping us shape our perspective as young architects and find our place within the discipline.

To me, participating in architectural competitions is an important form of communication—an opportunity to articulate one’s architectural ideologies and to narrate one’s stance in the built environment. Equally significant is the act of listening: when confronted with the same brief, the diversity and contrast of architectural responses reveal how varied interpretations, values, and priorities can emerge. This plurality—often marked by debate, controversy, and heterogeneity—is among the most compelling and valuable aspects of architecture, driving critical reflection, innovation, and the continuous evolution of the discipline.

Competitions provide a unique platform for "Pragmatic Utopianism." They allow us to test spatial strategies and innovative hypotheses for a "planet in transition"—ideas that will eventually become market standards. They are opportunities to engage in global architectural discourse and bridge the gap between theory and practice.

The competition theme reminded me of a five-day trek I took along the Korea Trail last summer with my friends. While walking along the coast, I noticed many abandoned military guard posts. They were old and neglected, but I believed they held significant historical and symbolic value. At the same time, I realized that the trail lacked basic infrastructure for hikers. I thought that repurposing these outposts into trekking hubs would be a great way to preserve history while also addressing a practical social need.

Competitions provide room to grow, to explore one’s own creativity and expand its boundaries. Through registering for the competition I wished to challenge myself, test my own creative thinking abilities and feel inspired to think boldly and create something meaningful. What I value in architectural competitions are their unique themes that often inspire to delve deeper and seek creative answers that may shape future architecture.

We participate because competitions allow curiosity to move faster. They are a testing ground—a place to refine ideas, take risks, and push questions further than conventional practice usually allows.

Competitions serve as a preliminary validation process for my academic theories. They provide a valuable platform to practically apply and test my ideas on spatial innovation before introducing them to the real world.