Buildner is a global leader in organizing architecture competitions of all scales — from furniture, cottages, and guesthouses to full city rebranding. With prize budgets ranging from €5,000 to €500,000, Buildner brings proven global experience to every competition.

Launch a competition

Launch a competition

Introduction

COMPETITION ORGANISERS
Concrete 
Pavilion

Buildner is pleased to announce the results of the Concrete Pavilion competition, an international design challenge dedicated to exploring the architectural, structural, and environmental potential of concrete. As part of our ongoing Material Studies series, this edition invited architects and designers to reconsider one of the world’s most ubiquitous building materials and to reimagine its role in shaping contemporary public space.

Participants were asked to design a pavilion of up to 50 m² that could function as both a spatial experience and a demonstration of material innovation. Beyond formal expression, proposals were encouraged to engage with sustainability, construction methodology, tactile quality, and the broader cultural implications of building with concrete. The brief sought projects that would test assumptions about weight, permanence, and rigidity while advancing new approaches to performance and craft.

The response was ambitious and wide-ranging. Submissions explored thin-shell structures, earth-cast processes, adaptive reuse strategies, and infrastructural reinterpretations. Many projects challenged the conventional image of concrete as heavy and inert, presenting instead porous, luminous, and context-sensitive structures that engaged climate, landscape, and community.

Following review by an international jury panel, prize winners and honorable mentions have been selected for their conceptual clarity, technical ingenuity, and spatial impact. Together, the projects reflect the evolving possibilities of concrete as both material and medium, demonstrating how experimentation can expand its spatial, structural, and cultural potential.

We sincerely thank our jury panel
for their time and expertise

Sekou Cooke

Black Reconstruction Collective

USA

Karin Fendt

Kuehn Malvezzi

Germany

Moon Hoon

Moon_Bal_Sso

South Korea

Marco Mazzotta

Heatherwick Studio

UK

Erika Nakagawa

Erika Nakagawa Office

Japan

Edoardo Tibuzzi

AKT II

UK

Lei Zheng

Zaha Hadid Architects

UK

1st Prize Winner

Project name

Re-Maze

We participate in architecture competitions because they provide a critical platform for experimentation, learning, and dialogue. Competitions allow us to explore ideas beyond the limitations of conventional practice, question established norms, and test innovative design approaches. They also encourage collaborative thinking and push us to clearly articulate concepts within specific constraints of time, site, and program. Through this process, we strengthen our ability to respond creatively and responsibly to complex architectural challenges. Most importantly, competitions offer an opportunity to engage with broader architectural discourse, receive critical feedback, and contribute ideas that address social, cultural, and spatial issues. For us, they are not only a means of professional growth, but also a way to refine our architectural position and design methodology.

Read full interview
Authors
Hamid Karimiantakbolagh
Saber Karamzadeh
Leila Nikjoosafa
Amirmohammad Taheri
Country
Austria
  • 9/10 Linework
  • 9/10 Quality of drawings
  • 8/10 Balance of color
  • 8/10 Layout
  • 7/10 Hierarchy
  • 7/10 Annotation
  • 6/10 Text
  • 8/10 Clarity of story
  • 8/10 Clarity of diagrams
  • 9/10 Quality of overall presentation

2nd Prize Winner

Project name

Cultivating Pavilion

Author
Nuttapol Techopitch
Country
Thailand
  • 8/10 Linework
  • 8/10 Quality of drawings
  • 9/10 Balance of color
  • 8/10 Layout
  • 8/10 Hierarchy
  • 8/10 Annotation
  • 7/10 Text
  • 9/10 Clarity of story
  • 8/10 Clarity of diagrams
  • 9/10 Quality of overall presentation

3rd Prize Winner

Project name

Push Pull

We enter competitions to explore new ideas that are not constrained by the gatekeepers of academia or by clients in professional practice. They give us the freedom to tackle any brief that piques our interest and approach it in our own way.

Read full interview
Authors
Koh Noguchi
Ssu-Kuo Lo
Country
United Kingdom
  • 8/10 Linework
  • 8/10 Quality of drawings
  • 9/10 Balance of color
  • 9/10 Layout
  • 8/10 Hierarchy
  • 7/10 Annotation
  • 7/10 Text
  • 9/10 Clarity of story
  • 7/10 Clarity of diagrams
  • 8/10 Quality of overall presentation

Buildner Student Award

Project name

Folding Concrete

We participate in architecture competitions as a space for constant experimentation and growth. Competitions allow us to test ideas that may be difficult to pursue within conventional academic or professional constraints, pushing us to challenge assumptions about form, structure, and spatial experience. They encourage innovation—not as novelty, but as a disciplined process of questioning, prototyping, and refining. Each competition becomes an opportunity to explore new technologies, fabrication methods, and design logics, while sharpening our ability to communicate ideas clearly and rigorously. For us, competitions are not about a single outcome, but about sustaining a mindset: always experimenting, always challenging ourselves, and always innovating through design.

Read full interview
Authors
Yi Yang
Chun Zhou
Country
United States
+72 points Buildner University Rankings
  • 8/10 Linework
  • 8/10 Quality of drawings
  • 8/10 Balance of color
  • 8/10 Layout
  • 7/10 Hierarchy
  • 8/10 Annotation
  • 7/10 Text
  • 8/10 Clarity of story
  • 9/10 Clarity of diagrams
  • 8/10 Quality of overall presentation

Buildner Sustainability Award

Project name

Earth Moves

As practices that span professional projects and academic research, we see competitions as wonderful vehicles through which to test our more fundamental research endeavours. Further, competitions offer a model of peer-review that is specific to design-led research and as such they provide a valuable framework to measure impact. Finally, we also greatly appreciate the communities that participate in and share their knowledge via competitions. Advancing architectural practice demands both opportunity and forums of dissemination and for us competitions, even perhaps more so than conferences, facilitate both.

Read full interview
  • 7/10 Linework
  • 8/10 Quality of drawings
  • 8/10 Balance of color
  • 8/10 Layout
  • 7/10 Hierarchy
  • 8/10 Annotation
  • 7/10 Text
  • 8/10 Clarity of story
  • 8/10 Clarity of diagrams
  • 8/10 Quality of overall presentation

Honorable mentions

Show honorable mentions (6 of 6) Hide honorable mentions projects
Project name

GROUND ZERO_Concrete as Witness

Competitions serve as a platform for us to explore fresh ideas, challenge ourselves, and experiment with cutting-edge design concepts. They grant us the freedom to think creatively and approach problems in unconventional ways, which fosters a culture of innovation within our team. This environment also enables us to continuously refine our skills as we engage with diverse design briefs and problem-solving scenarios, offering a sense of growth and development. Moreover, competitions provide an opportunity to inspire others and, in turn, increase our visibility and recognition within the architectural community and beyond. This exposure can significantly enhance our presence and reputation, amplifying our impact on the field. In essence, participating in architecture competitions resonates with our commitment to innovation, collaboration, social responsibility, and historical preservation. It empowers us to stretch the boundaries of our creativity, advance professionally, expand our professional network, gain acknowledgment, and contribute positively to our society.

Read full interview
Authors
Roxana-Andreea Irimia
Mihai Bogdan Ionită
Country
Romania
Project name

Kiwa

Competitions allow Architecture to return to its conceptual essence. Competitions create space to test ideas that may not emerge in conventional practice. For us, they are opportunities to refine our own Architectural philosophy and express cultural narratives through design.

Read full interview
Authors
Chae Eun Kim
Chae Lin Kim
Country
South Korea
Project name

Archive of Aggregate

We participate in competitions as a space for exploration beyond the formal boundaries of academic institutions or professional practice. Competitions allow us to engage directly with a defined brief, site conditions, and constraints such as budget and program, while still operating with intellectual and creative freedom. They function as both a testing ground for ideas and a method of developing our own design positions through focused research, experimentation, and collaboration.

Read full interview
Project name

One Foot

Competitions allow a degree of freedom that daily practice often cannot afford. They provide a concentrated moment to test ideas, experiment with material strategies, and articulate architectural positions with clarity. For young practices especially, competitions open access to public agendas that might otherwise remain distant. For us, competitions are opportunities to refine questions and sharpen our position within architectural discourse.

Read full interview
Authors
Junyub Kim
Jeon Chaeeun
Country
Switzerland
Project name

Re:Concrete

Competitions provide a space for exploration and experimentation that is often difficult to access within conventional practice. They allow us to question assumptions, test alternative material strategies, and respond to urgent global challenges such as environmental resilience and circular construction. They also create opportunities to contribute to broader architectural discourse and engage with ideas beyond immediate project constraints.

Read full interview
Authors
Shivani Rastogi
Jialu Hou
Kaixin Su
Taoyu Han
Country
United Kingdom
Project name

Cast in Reverse

We participate in architecture competitions as a way to explore ideas that extend beyond the constraints of conventional practice. They provide an opportunity to test new approaches to materials, construction, and the relationship between architecture and site.

Read full interview
Authors
Yanchen Yu
Hua Chai
Country
United States

Shortlisted projects

Show Shortlisted projects Hide Shortlisted projects

The Concrete Evangelist

Jacob Hamilton Browning
United States

Cast in Reverse

Yanchen Yu
Hua Chai
United States

Elevated Mature

Helena Kalčić
Slovenia

Re-Maze

Hamid Karimiantakbolagh
Saber Karamzadeh
Leila Nikjoosafa
Amirmohammad Taheri
Austria

Concrete in motion

Natalia Kosik
Julia Retelewska
Antonina Grzechnik

Poznan University of Technology , Politechnika Poznańska

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Poland

A Hamangia Pavilion - The Elephant in the room

Daniel-david Timofan
Romania

Constellation A Temporary, Reconfigurable Concrete Pavilion

Alejandro Salgado Garcia
Canada

Re:Concrete

Shivani Rastogi
Jialu Hou
Kaixin Su
Taoyu Han
United Kingdom

Concrete Pavilion

ömer Faruk Duman
Turkey

Cubierta

Hansol Kang
Eun Bok Lee
Oumjy Zhang
South Korea

Concrete Field

Marietta Parioti
United Kingdom

The Living Concrete Pavilion

Hasan Chenaghlou
Turkey

Translucent Matter

Hariel Sedijra Noe Kinha
Canada

The Spiral

Valdemar Pavlovski
Lithuania

One Foot

Junyub Kim
Jeon Chaeeun
Switzerland

Trail of the Wind

Christina Marie Brown
United States

Archive of Aggregate

Diane Yun Choi
Yuka Imada

GSAPP, Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
United States

Focus

Francisco De Paula Corbella Salas
Spain

Three Form Pavilion

F.myles Sciotto
United States

Path Through Concrete

Matthew John Kettle
United Kingdom

Blooming Concrete

Radu Stefănescu

Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism - UAUIM

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Romania

Bio-active concrete pavilion

Marleen Kose

TalTech – Tallinn University of Technology

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Estonia

The Egg

Jae Woo Lee

Jeju National University

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
South Korea

Subsurface Memory

Jiawei Sun
New Zealand

Poured Fragments

Luis Felipe Sanchez Carvajal
United States

Folding Concrete

Yi Yang
Chun Zhou

University of Pennsylvania

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
United States

Kiwa

Chae Eun Kim
Chae Lin Kim
South Korea

Concretus - Leaning Together, Standing as One

Gyuyoung Jeong
Jinyoung Baek

Kaywon University of Art & Design

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
South Korea

Earth Moves

Lain James Maxwell

supermanoeuvre collaborating with apeapeape, Arup and University of Technology Sydney

Australia

Push Pull

Koh Noguchi
Ssu-Kuo Lo
United Kingdom

Echinus

Francesco Tucci
Switzerland

A Shotcrete Pavilion ; Toward Continuity with Nature

Min Jiwon
Kangmin Jo
South Korea

The Shattered Circle

Manuel Campo

Kore University of Enna/ Università Kore di Enna

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Italy

The Concrete Stratum

Javier Enrique Saavedra De Riglos
Brandon Neal Kaller
Jonathan Nelson Chades
Jorge Anibal Del Castillo

Kaller Architects

United States

From Bunker to Garden: Reimagining Civic Resilience

Hana Ishikawa

Site Design Group, Ltd.

United States

Cultivating Pavilion

Nuttapol Techopitch
Thailand

Suspended Clearing

Shenglu Qiu
Aotong Yan
United States

GROUND ZERO_Concrete as Witness

Roxana-Andreea Irimia
Mihai Bogdan Ionită

AEK design studio

Romania

GRVTY: Adaptive Topographies

Mateo Perez Makolska

Portal Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Colombia

Sound of the Ocean

Jialin Yue

GSAPP, Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
United States