Introduction
Buildner is excited to announce the results of the Denver Single-Stair Housing Challenge.
This international competition challenged architects, urban designers, and policymakers to rethink the Point Access Block—a common mid-rise housing typology found in cities worldwide. Participants were invited to propose innovative and adaptable designs that improve spatial efficiency, enhance community interaction, and promote sustainable urban living. The goal was to explore how architecture can address contemporary housing challenges, offering solutions that balance density, livability, and environmental responsibility.
Entrants were encouraged to consider factors such as modularity, affordability, access to natural light and ventilation, and integration with public spaces. The competition sought to inspire forward-thinking approaches that redefine how urban housing can support diverse lifestyles and evolving societal needs while responding to climate-conscious design principles.
Buildner collaborated with an outstanding, experienced jury to evaluate the submissions:
Cole Chandler – Senior Advisor on Homelessness for Denver Mayor Mike Johnston and Deputy Director of All In Mile High, leading efforts to address housing and homelessness
Michael Eliason – Founder of Larch Lab, an architecture and urbanism think tank specializing in low-energy housing, mass timber, and climate-adaptive urbanism
Lauren Folkerts – Architect at HMH Architecture + Interiors and Boulder City Council Member, advocating for sustainability and equitable housing policies
Jon Gambrill – Co-Managing Director at Gensler, providing leadership in commercial building design, redevelopment, and urban placemaking
Kate Hilbert – Senior Director of Real Estate Development at Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver, overseeing affordable housing projects and land acquisition strategies
Matt Hutchins – Founding Principal of CAST Architecture, Seattle Planning Commissioner, and advocate for abundant housing and sustainable zoning reform
Sean Jursnick – Co-Chair of AIA Colorado Housing Committee, architect, and building code advocate focused on innovative and efficient housing solutions
Peter F. LiFari – CEO of Maiker Housing Partners, leading affordable housing initiatives and public-private partnerships to address housing accessibility
Terra Mazzeo – Architect and urban designer, leader of Stantec’s CoRE Architecture Studio, and advocate for equitable and resilient city planning
Sarah Parady – Denver City Council Member and longtime advocate for economic justice, labor protections, and housing policy reform
Todd Wenkoski – Urban designer with extensive experience in public and private redevelopment projects, specializing in city planning, mobility, and public space design
Buildner and the jury team carefully reviewed submissions, assessing originality, feasibility, and the potential to enhance urban housing through innovative and adaptable design strategies. Buildner and its jury extend their gratitude to all participants for their thoughtful contributions and congratulate the winners on their outstanding designs.
We sincerely thank our jury panel
for their time and expertise
Cole Chandler
City and County of Denver
USA

Michael Eliason
Larch Lab
USA

Lauren Folkerts
HMH Architecture + Interiors
USA

Jon Gambrill
Gensler
USA

Kate Hilbert
Real Estate Development, Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver
USA

Matt Hutchins
CAST Architecture
USA

Sean Jursnick
SAR+ Architects
USA

Peter LiFari
Maiker Housing Partners
USA

Terra Mazzeo
Stantec
USA

Sarah Parady
Denver City Council
USA

Todd Wenkoski
Livable Cities Studio
USA

Darrell Watson
Denver City Council
United States

1st Prize Winner
Detached Living

We participate in architecture competitions because they offer a rare opportunity to break away from the constraints of daily projects and routines, encouraging us to think more creatively and approach design with fresh eyes. As architects, it’s essential to embrace change, to question familiar processes, experiment with new ideas, and challenge ourselves to solve problems in innovative ways. Competitions provide this creative freedom, allowing us to tackle unique design briefs that push us to grow both individually and as a team. They also expose us to new architectural challenges, different cultural and environmental contexts, and evolving design trends from around the world. Beyond the design process itself, competitions are a valuable way to connect with other architects, designers, and creative minds, expanding our professional network and introducing our work to a broader audience. Ultimately, they help us stay inspired, adaptable, and engaged with the ever-changing nature of architecture.
Read full interviewJury feedback summary
Detached Living is designed to enhance adaptability, sustainability, and urban integration. The building features a modular unit layout, organized around a central atrium that facilitates natural ventilation. The facade consists of movable louvers and sliding glass doors, allowing residents to regulate shading, airflow, and privacy. Prefabricated concrete and maple wood are employed for durability, thermal efficiency, and sustainability. Read more Movable partitions within units enable spatial flexibility. External staircases separate vertical circulation from living spaces, optimizing safety and usable floor area. Rainwater collection, graywater recycling, and photovoltaic panels contribute to reduced resource consumption. The project aims to balance functional efficiency with environmental considerations while maintaining compliance with local building codes.

Being a single-stair competition, the knee-jerk reaction is to make the project about expressing the stair, but the focus here is the livability of the units. The free standing circulation core creates opportunities for daylight and ventilation in every habitable room, for every unit. This scheme embraces the site's width, with two slender blocks reducing the urban scale. The ground floor has a welcoming vibe and protected open spaces that will feel sheltered in winter, and shady and open in the summer. I would reopen the thinking about what the property line facade materials are--it looks to be concrete and as such is an unnecessary carbon expenditure, when the application is better suited for mass timber. Kitchens are generally undersized and the studios could have been one bedrooms with a partition separating sleeping from entry. The facade proportions and screens are elegant but could be further refined. The facade's planters could have been stretched to be habitable balconies.
Matt Hutchins / Buildner guest jury
CAST Architecture, USA

The design features elegant, exquisitely crafted aesthetics and graphic representation. The experience within the stair is elevated through natural light and the integration of greenery. A central void space serves as a simple and effective device to greatly improve the livability of residents in all units by introducing more building corners and exterior facades, thereby increasing access to light, air, and views. The double-skin façade performs a dual function, reducing solar heat gain while allowing residents to customize their environment through movable screens and opportunities for planting. Unit plans are thoughtfully developed to maximize connection to light, air, and views. Additionally, the introduction of a ground-floor commercial space is important for fostering a connection to the neighborhood.
Terra Mazzeo / Buildner guest jury
Stantec, USA

The project has a good unit mix, and smart plans that allow daylight on opposite sides. The utilization of zero lot lines for sideyard setbacks allows employment of typologies found in south and central american, but rare in the US. smart approach to allow for wider units and pair with courtyard voids.
Michael Eliason / Buildner guest jury
Larch Lab, USA
Enter an open architecture competition now
2nd Prize Winner
Brick and bloom

Participating in competitions on Buildner offers a rare opportunity to freely explore my ideas without being constrained by immediate financial decisions. It allows me to experiment with innovative architectural solutions, test sustainable approaches, and imagine spaces where creativity takes precedence over profitability. This is an essential approach to renewing architectural practice and anticipating the housing challenges of tomorrow.
Read full interviewJury feedback summary
Brick and Bloom utilizes earth bricks, low-carbon concrete, and bioclimatic strategies to reduce environmental impact. Natural ventilation, solar chimneys, and dual-orientation units optimize thermal comfort and energy efficiency. Residences feature private green spaces and cantilevered balconies, enhancing urban biodiversity. Shared outdoor areas, including a rooftop garden and central courtyard, foster community interaction. Read more A flexible layout maximizes daylight and cross-ventilation, while volumetric gradation ensures seamless urban integration. The ground floor includes bike storage and commercial space to support sustainable mobility. The design balances architectural heritage with contemporary elements, addressing ecological and social challenges in urban living.

This project exemplifies thoughtful design, with a beautiful human scale facade that strikes a perfect balance between traditional and modern unique details. Every aspect of design from context and orientation to the flow of the floor plans feels meticulously considered, resulting in a design that is not only highly functional but also deeply compelling. Its beauty and believability make it the kind of project one would hope to see built in their own neighborhood. The carefully curated material palette further elevates the design, adding richness and depth. This level of refinement makes it a standout deserving of recognition.
Lauren Folkerts / Buildner guest jury
HMH Architecture + Interiors, USA

With a massing that is sensitive to the neighborhood scale and materials inspired by the local context, Brick and Bloom naturally fits in on the street.A clean and understated facade creates an inviting public face and inside the building residents enjoy units that all face multiple orientations to take advantage of the single vertical means of egress.
Sean Jursnick / Buildner guest jury
SAR+ Architects, USA

Brick and Bloom’s choice of materials catches your eye. However, it is the innovative way that the designers utilize those materials, design and architecture. There are other passive energy designs in this competition but this participant more clearly presented a convincing passive energy design for Denver's very volatile climate without sacrificing shared private spaces for residents.
Darrell Watson / Buildner guest jury
Denver City Council, United States

The project plays off of the massing possibilities with a single stair. It has good unit layouts, and the project ensures nearly all units are corner or triple aspect, allowing for better daylight and ventilation. It features a wide variety of outdoor spaces - courtyard, private balconies, roof garden. It yields a good unit mix for a wide variety of residents.
Michael Eliason / Buildner guest jury
Larch Lab, USA

The use of brick and why it was used, is really well done on this scheme. Though I feel that the side placement of the core impacts the capacity for open space and daylight from more sides of the units.
Jon Gambrill / Buildner guest jury
Gensler, USA
3rd Prize Winner
Red Rocks Rising

We are leaders and members of Studio X, a specialized design studio within Page, created to assist teams in delivering elevated design responses by enhancing the creative process and expanding design possibilities. Within Studio X, our FUTURES initiative is dedicated to design-fueled innovation—driving ideation and prototyping to explore new directions in design. Competitions provide a platform to engage with complex challenges, test emerging concepts, and develop solutions that spark meaningful dialogue. They encourage us to push beyond conventional constraints, producing work that is both visionary and technically rigorous. Competitions also give us the freedom to experiment, collaborate across disciplines, and refine ideas that may shape future projects. They challenge us to communicate bold concepts with clarity, deepening our understanding of design’s impact on the built environment.
Read full interview
Jury feedback summary
Red Rocks Rising is a modular, multifamily housing project integrating Passive House principles for energy efficiency and occupant comfort. The design utilizes prefabricated units to minimize waste and optimize construction time. A central atrium and external stairways enhance natural ventilation and daylight access, reducing reliance on mechanical systems. High-performance glazing, thermal bridge elimination, and airtight enclosures improve insulation and indoor climate control. Read more Shared outdoor spaces, including a rooftop garden, promote community interaction. Water reclamation and resource-efficient fixtures further support sustainability. The project challenges conventional fire safety norms by incorporating pressurized evacuation routes and compartmentalized dwelling units, enhancing resilience. The design balances affordability, environmental impact, and urban livability.

This is a nice proposal with thoughtful integration of egress and circulation related to safety requirements while also creating a different building massing and unit types with shared common areas. The one challenge with this scheme is that it appears to be a very costly prototype that may limit affordability.
Todd Wenkoski / Buildner guest jury
Livable Cities Studio, USA

This project excels in its thoughtful integration of local context, safety, and sustainability. The reference to the iconic Red Rocks and fire safety ties the design to its surroundings and cultural context in a meaningful way, creating a strong sense of place. The emphasis on fire safety is especially commendable, addressing a critical concern with well-considered design strategies. Additionally, the combination of Passive House principles with modular construction showcases an innovative and forward-thinking approach to cost effective efficiency and sustainability.
Lauren Folkerts / Buildner guest jury
HMH Architecture + Interiors, USA

Red Rock Rising is an ebullient mashup. I appreciate bringing all these ideas together, even if it isn't always harmonious. The street and alley halves read as two buildings, and the canyon central stair could be tightened up to create more intentional space for neighbors.The multigenerational unit mix is admirable and the commitment to passive house/modular construction is commendable. There is an intentional sense of this as an urban building, as part of a lively changing cityscape, which makes it feel like it would be a good neighbor despite not trying to fit in.
Matt Hutchins / Buildner guest jury
CAST Architecture, USA

This project has a lot to offer but it feels a bit too much like a commercial asset which would generate pushback from the neighborhood character contingency. I also worry about capital needs in the future with the exterior elements requiring costly maintenance. I do appreciate the attention to safety and appreciate the submission as a whole.
Peter LiFari / Buildner guest jury
Maiker Housing Partners, USA
Buildner Student Award
OutSide Inn

I believe that people grow and develop through challenges. For me, competitions provide the ideal environment to test my skills, reflect on them, and improve myself. These environments can feature diverse cultures, problems, and rules, which is the greatest richness of architecture competitions. Each project has its own dynamics, and the competition always encourages you to take one step further. At the end of the competition, beyond winning a prize or feeling a sense of satisfaction, the most important aspect is the personal growth and insights you gain along the way.
Read full interviewJury feedback summary
OutSide-Inn is a modular project prioritizing circular design, sustainability, and community living. Constructed from prefabricated timber and recycled materials, the building reduces environmental impact while enabling adaptability. Solar panels generate electricity, and a central shaft system harvests and recycles water for irrigation and underfloor heating. The design promotes cross-ventilation and passive cooling, minimizing energy consumption. Read more Shared spaces, including rooftop gardens and communal nooks, encourage social interaction. A flexible layout accommodates diverse household types, with co-housing and family units arranged to foster connectivity. Fire safety is addressed through an open stair design, improving access and evacuation efficiency. The project integrates sustainable urban living with resource efficiency and affordability.

The design features a simple, clear massing and organizational strategy with an elegant aesthetic. Well-considered uses for flexible semi-public “nooks” create a joyful sense of community. The placement of private spaces, such as bedrooms and bathrooms, on corners, outside walls, and adjacent to semi-public nooks is questioned for its impact on functionality and privacy. Additionally, the necessity of density reduction for life safety is examined, raising the question of how to optimize fire department access while balancing the need for urban density and affordability.
Terra Mazzeo / Buildner guest jury
Stantec, USA

I really appreciate the rationale for this one and the thoughtfulness of the staircase arriving at opposite levels. The amount of glazing is really nice, and the feel of the units is really well done. The use of heavy timber was quite nice including wood as a cladding element. I do have concerns on the long term appropriateness of the cladding. I also thought more attention to accessibility and inclusivity could have occurred.
Jon Gambrill / Buildner guest jury
Gensler, USA

Stunning concept. An excellent design that is creative, yet practical for its use of prefab and modular timber. I love the circular design. This is where Denver needs to go: this is innovation; this is the future, if we allow it. A wonderful concept that has the wow factor.
Peter LiFari / Buildner guest jury
Maiker Housing Partners, USA

A good scheme with social orientation and thoughtful consideration of stair and egress code as a formative aspect of the proposal.
Todd Wenkoski / Buildner guest jury
Livable Cities Studio, USA
Buildner Sustainability Award
Beyond The Invisible

In a way, it is part of the educational process. Participating in competitions provides an opportunity to learn something new throughout the process while also offering freedom in decision-making.
Read full interviewJury feedback summary
Beyond the Invisible is designed to balance urban integration, sustainability, and community engagement. The building’s mirrored façades reflect the surrounding environment, blending into the cityscape while maintaining a distinct visual presence. The structure is composed of prefabricated timber, optimizing efficiency and reducing environmental impact. Shared spaces, including a rooftop greenhouse and communal terraces, encourage social interaction and urban farming. Read more Passive design strategies, geothermal heating, and a heat recovery ventilation system improve energy efficiency. The ground floor functions as a public hub with coworking areas and retail spaces. The project reimagines modern urban living by fostering connections between residents, nature, and the city.

There is a continuity of the landscape from public plaza, to the central core and to the roof top garden that feels like more than the sum of its parts. The plans, sections, and tectonics are well resolved and I'd love to live in a country where this optimistic unit mix was the norm. I wonder what the north side is hiding: the challenge with new buildings of this scale is that they'll stand alone as an object in the urban landscape for a generation. The stainless steel facade seems out of touch with the intensity of the Colorado sun.
Matt Hutchins / Buildner guest jury
CAST Architecture, USA

Beyond the Invisible's single stair design is used to create a dynamic design with a bold shape, embrace of nature, and warm interior spaces.The use of natural materials contrasts a bold building form while the building program informs thoughtful articulation that create inviting and useful spaces.Importantly, the project creates a variety of living options through a range of unit sizes.
Sean Jursnick / Buildner guest jury
SAR+ Architects, USA

A strong sustainability emphasis and consideration of community orientation for ground floor uses. The exterior material choice seems harsh and unsuitable for the Denver climate.
Todd Wenkoski / Buildner guest jury
Livable Cities Studio, USA

Beyond the invisible presentation almost made you forget that you are evaluating a single stair project. The intentional inclusion of sustainable energy sources for powering the residences to parking and charging EVs to bike parking and a greenhouse all provide an exciting vision for what's possible.
Darrell Watson / Buildner guest jury
Denver City Council, United States

The concept of standing out is questioned in relation to the potential height increase of adjacent low-rise buildings. The semi-public ground floor is appreciated, with a suggestion to integrate public uses such as commercial space. The section is particularly admired for its design, with ground-floor landscaping that extends up the courtyard and onto the roof. While the section and plan feel well considered, they remain conventional; the strategy of creating additional building corners effectively connects people to light, air, and views, though these corners are often allocated to private bedrooms rather than common living areas. Given the stair’s prominence in the design challenge, it feels too common and lacks a sense of celebration.
Terra Mazzeo / Buildner guest jury
Stantec, USA
Honorable mentions
16 COURTYRADS

We participate in this architecture competition as young architects eager to engage with thought-provoking challenges, contribute our ideas to the industry, and continuously rethink the role of architecture. Competitions push us to explore innovative solutions, refine our design approach, and stay actively involved in the broader architectural discourse.
Read full interviewCapitol Co-housing

We do a very select number of competitions, and use them as a way to test design ideas or showcase a method or scale of working that we do not have previous experience in. We like the concise brief and constraints of a competition, but do not always enjoy the limited public/stakeholder engagement nor the minimal opportunity for reimbursement of labor. This one was about a code reform movement we have a deep passion for and wish to showcase its potential as a form of advocacy.
Read full interviewBundle House

We love to challenge ourselves, as well as challenging the architectural norm. It provides a platform where we imagine what the architecture can be and what it should be.
Read full interviewThe Silver Grove

We participate in architecture competitions because they push the boundaries of creativity and innovation, allowing us to explore ideas beyond the constraints of everyday practice. They provide a platform to experiment, refine our design philosophy, and challenge ourselves alongside other talented professionals. Competitions also offer the opportunity to shape meaningful spaces that respond to real-world issues, from sustainability to cultural identity. Ultimately, they fuel our passion for architecture, helping us grow as designers while working on projects that have the potential to leave a lasting impact.
Read full interviewICHI

Architecture competitions are food for creativity. It’s like a playground where I can push boundaries and break a few rules without worrying about permits, budgets, or clients.
Read full interviewTOGETHERHAUS

Competitions offer a unique opportunity to explore ideas freely, without the usual constraints of budgets or client demands, enabling us to develop a strong architectural voice. They also foster professional growth by allowing us to engage with new technologies, learn from diverse perspectives, and continuously experiment and refine our design philosophy.
Read full interviewShortlisted projects
LIVING LAYERS INTERCONNECTED HOUSING FOR MULTIGENERATIONAL LIVING
CO-Habitat
Toronto Metropolitan University - TMU
+2 points Buildner University Rankings!
REBORN [ ] DENVER
Chonnam National University - 전남대학교
+2 points Buildner University Rankings!
Glow Beyond
ETH Zurich
+2 points Buildner University Rankings!
Green Twins
West Pomeranian University of Technology, Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie, ZUT)
+2 points Buildner University Rankings!
PAB - EMERSON APARTMENTS
1338 emerson
Red Rocks Rising

Promoted projects
Living Spiral

My daily work mainly involves documentation and coordination. Participating in competitions allows me to focus on the conceptual phase and continually explore what architecture can contribute to the world.
Read full interview