Under
Bridge

It is interesting how the bridge as the centre of the arrangement becomes the view rather than being a device to catch a view from. The project accepts the infrastructural object of enormous scale as a skyline or view, while commerce and housing underneath follow their own needs instead of matching the scale that the bridge introduces.

The project creates an innovative community on the water which nicely relates to the bridge that crosses it. It respects the locals' cultural traditions.

I appreciate the out-of-the-box approach; adding a permanence and location for the more temporary and informal is powerful and asks a lot of good questions. Why don't we always add life under bridges?

A great proposal that explores the scale of a megastructure at the urban scale and its impact on local communities. The project deals with the "negative space" and distances itself from the very high roof that forms the bridge deck to create a poetic experience at the water level and provide cultural contribution to the community. Interesting response!

A cultural and meaningful design that explores the question of scale (local community/ megastructure) and the negative space of "under the bridge roof".

The proposal goes beyond basic residential units by undoing the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge's disruption to local Tanka fishing communities. It combines housing with fishing and aquaculture, culture, and tourism to create a complete community of jobs and homes beneath the bridge. The perfect square of floating homes and industry wraps a large aquatic courtyard for aquaculture. An open corner cradles the existing island to create a focal point and destination for the community. Meanwhile, the space directly below the bridge is a triumphantly arched market hall of culture and commerce. The aesthetic and structural device of arches carried throughout at varying scales feels both traditional and modern and is utilized to create both monumental and cozy spaces. The urban effect is unified and sublime without feeling repetitive. Detailed housing unit layouts would really be the cherry on top.

This project aims to incorporate the cultural heritage of the Dan Family into its design, presenting a concept that potentially harmonizes tradition and modernity.

This is innovative. I can see the link to the community, as well as the flexibility in usage. I like the inclusion of the economic possibilities as well. However, accessibility in emergencies, fire, or bringing services does seem to make this challenging.

An effective use of a pre-existing modular system, the "infrastructural" character is appropriate, economical, and adaptable.

A successful integration of expressway and housing, the designers chose to build under and above the expressway to form a community. It creates an inviting urban environment.

The proposal extends possibilities in space and beyond the bridge itself. Cars are insulated, the top of the bridge is a landscape pathway, and the hexagonal module structure provides a poetic opportunity to explore the in-between space. A convincing strategy.

The proposal explores an interesting spatial solution, creating a honeycomb 3D network that challenges the concept of being "under the bridge" to becoming "within the bridge." It provides a geometric solution to create a landscape experience for the user.

A bold proposal that pushes the idea of what "underbridge housing" can be. There is rich geometric potential in the modular system.

This submission combines visionary, utopian thinking with a strong level of technical resolution, making it a believable proposal. The choice of the Manhattan Bridge as a site is excellent, and the project strikes an elegant relationship with the NYC icon.

This is one of the few projects that allows users to really engage with the surroundings and the views in the distance. There's a lightness and transparency that feels appropriate given the additional load to an existing structure.

The project features a fascinating structural design and presents innovative concepts for the expansion of metropolitan areas.

A beautiful and poetic dialogue with the existing iconic Brooklyn Bridge. How can we not resist being suspended, independently connected, above the water and its reflections? A meaningful contribution.

Structurally, the proposal works in harmony with the bridge while also providing identity to each unit and the public realm. Aesthetically, it does not copy or compete with the NYC engineering icon but complements it with a restrained structural expressionist style and industrial finishes. The manual lifts are a novel touch that could be a breakthrough if they are easily operated and manufactured for a reasonable price. It all feels very site-appropriate as a connection between Brooklyn and Manhattan. Yet, it is easy to conceive of adapting the typology to other urban locations.

The proposal is simply playful with the existing iconic Brooklyn Bridge structure. It really engages the site's potential, the experience of being under the bridge, suspended and independent. The mirror concept and the independent U-shaped housing concept offer functionality and create a beautiful landmark.

The moveable backyards are perhaps an unnecessary feature in favor of a more accessible alternative entry connecting to a shared electric lift. Planted spaces may fare better on the outside of the units, where more direct sunlight will be received. A clever concept for plumbing and building services would put the submission over the top.

An innovative structural approach to the attachment of the modules to the bridge. AVI FRIEDMAN This proposal provides dignified homes in a location in need of affordable units. The homes are believable as affordable units while also appearing very livable and comfortable. The views as shown from these units would be absolutely stunning—in competition with some of the most expensive units in the city.

It's a clever idea—and makes for great views. But safety would be a concern for me. This is not a good setup for children or the disabled. And inclement weather would leave these units unprotected. SAMISTA JUGWANTH Clean, clear, and beautifully executed.

This project uses clever space planning methods to achieve a compact layout that feels livable and flexible. The in-betweener zones maintain grade-level porosity and create a rhythm, so the project does not function as an urban barricade. The double-skin facade and utilization of passive environmental control demonstrate a high level of technical resolve and sensitivity to the local climate.

The advantage of the project lies in creating diverse housing with outstanding facades that respect vernacular tradition, coupled with a strong community feel. Nice overall design.

Flexibility in usage options is well thought out. Site selection makes sense—well placed. The project considers sustainability initiatives such as inclement weather protection, natural light and ventilation, materials, and greenery.

More consideration for the privacy of the occupants, especially by avoiding circulation through the secondary bedroom, would have made it a more scalable and modern design. Additional landscape features or community-oriented programs would really show the potential for this neighborhood.