International Architecture Competition

Kemeri
National Park
Observation Tower

Results

Foreword

Competition organisers

Kemeri 
National Park
Observation Tower

Official Partners

Kemeri 
National Park
Observation Tower

Kemeri National Park in western Latvia was established in 1997 to protect 380 square kilometers of land that includes forests, lakes, natural mineral springs and marshlands. The Great Kemeri Bog is a popular destination within the park, where visitors come to walk along several kilometers of existing boardwalks, allowing them to discover the many unique aspects of this vast expanse of wetlands, its collection of wildlife, and its variety of plant species. The protection of this land is managed by the Latvia Nature Conservation Agency, a partner organization in this design competition that expressed interest in constructing the winning proposal.

Competition participants were asked to deliver design proposals for a buildable observation structure situated along the boardwalk system, that would allow visitors new ways to view and experience the Great Kemeri Bog. While there were no dimensional requirements or height limitations prescribed, the recommended budget for the project was US $50k. Programmatic requirements included wheelchair accessibility for the disabled, as well as the use of construction materials that are easily maintainable and durable, considering the bog’s humid environment. The competition also challenged submissions to rethink the current boardwalk infrastructure for its replacement by a modular, more accessible design. The jury evaluated entries based on their constructability, accessibility, sensitivity to the environment, and the potential for the designs to provide Kemeri National Park with a new architectural landmark.

The entries proposed a wide range of ideas, with a variety of structural materials and forms. Modularity was integral in many of the submissions, as was ease of construction with minimal disturbance to the protected natural site. Several of the projects proposed enclosed or semi-concealed observation spaces in consideration of the bog’s wildlife. While most submissions included a system of ramps to permit elevated views, some experimented with the use of mirrors or periscope lenses, and others with the integration of manual lifts.

Each of the winning entries is deemed to be constructable, with the potential to become an important architectural landmark and to perform as a new observation point for the Great Kemari Bog. The high quality of the winning projects as well as the honorable mentions reflects the outstanding level of work submitted. Bee Breeders would like to thank all entrants for their participation.

1st Prize Winner

Project name

Funambulist Landscape

Authors

Ernesto Urquízar Quesada
María Cervantes Lardón

Spain

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

We think here we have the opportunity to be more radical, to show the source of our way of thinking in a free environment. Competitions represent an alternative not only to improve yourself but to go further and make demands of yourself.

Jury feedback summary

The jury was impressed by the “funambulist landscape”, the title of this proposal. Three stories of light-structured ramps are hung within a clean timber grid. A visitor walking up into this structure would experience a “new sequence of relationships” among the landscape, flora, and fauna. The result is a well-designed project that is integrated within the bog boardwalk. Its components could easily be prefabricated offsite. Given the scale of the structure, the jury wonders if the project as shown could be constructed without the use of heavy equipment and suggests the exterior framework be segmented into smaller timber elements. The project’s simple structure makes it easily adaptable and scalable. The submission drawings are beautifully executed and clear in their design intent.

2nd Prize Winner

Project name

Eye Tower

Authors

Nathira Haja

Malaysia

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

Participating in architecture vision competitions gives us a chance to explore further in various international projects. It also enhances our knowledge in assimilating and learning the new culture and development. Simultaneously, it’s an opportunity to explore and express the new concepts that we have not attempted on our daily basis projects.

Jury feedback summary

The most formally striking submission presented in this competition, the ‘eye tower’ features a spherical timber structure that encloses a lengthy spiraling ramp, elevating visitors well above the bog boardwalk. The large vertical members of the frame are completed at the apex with a series of smaller timber elements that act as a type of brise soleil, and help to give the structure a refined shape. The jury believes that, while the submission is likely not achievable on a budget of $50k, it could perhaps be scaled down for feasibility. Additionally, the base foundation for such a structure would likely be significantly larger, bringing to question whether the project could be constructed without damaging the bog ecosystem? The jury commends the designer for providing such a bold gesture that would certainly become a landmark within the park.

3rd Prize Winner +
BB STUDENT AWARD

Project name

Black Box

Authors

Hunor Albert Szántó
Fanni Zita Salamin

University

Budapest university of technology and economics
+126 points Buildner University Rankings!

Hungary

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

The site was very interesting at the first time too. And a good idea for the concept which came at the very beginning gave us the motivation to participate.

Jury feedback summary

The project is characterized by a simple 2.8m-wide x 1.5m-long grid comprised of wooden structural members and clad in a shell of burned-wood planks. The long-bar form of of the observation platform is integrated as part of the bog’s boardwalk. The submission includes a series of sectional images that describe a variation of viewing experiences defined by changing patterns of perforations in the shell’s walls and ceiling. It compares the viewing experience to a moving filmstrip, and describes the platform as a black box defined as a “device, process or system whose inputs and outputs are known, but whose internal structure or working is not well, or at all understood because of it’s confidential nature.” The jury found this submission to be buildable and well-suited for its location.

THE ACCESSIBLE TOWER AWARD

Project name

The Dark Hut

Authors

Angelo Ancarola
Antonio Mastria
Salvatore Possidente Del Monte
Luigi Simone

Italy

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

Participating in an architectural competition is an excellent exercise in conception and imagination capacities. It is an opportunity for personal growth. It allows you to compare yourself with new topics and, regardless of the results, it gives you the opportunity to compare your work with the work done by other people, offering you excellent food for thought and self-criticism cues. And last, but not least, an important reason that pushes us to participate in architecture competitions is that it allows us to meet and keep in touch despite the distance.

Honorable mentions

VIEWclose HONOURABLE MENTIONS

Project Name

In The Midst

University

Fh muenster
+72 points Buildner University Rankings!

Country

Germany

Project authors

Clemens Berresheim
Alex Kirschstein

Project Name

Kemeri: Three Turn Tower

Country

Japan

Project authors

Katsuya Fukushima
Hiroko Tominaga
Benjamin Sykes Thompson

Project Name

The Camouflage

Country

Indonesia

Project authors

Himawan Prakoso
Arief Singgih Wibowo
Nur Arsad Eko Pramono
Ardyana Fahmiadi

Project Name

Sensu Tower

Country

Japan

Project authors

Masato Endo
Shigeru Yoshino
Tomohiko Watabe
Natsumi Nihei

Project Name

Take a peek Tower

Country

France

Project authors

Joana Correia
Guillaume Boitier

Project Name

Four-Leaf Clover

Country

Switzerland

Project authors

Simon Bolt

Shortlisted projects

VIEWclose Shortlisted projects

Argentina

Faculty of Architecture Planning and Design UNR (Facultad de Arquitectura Planeamiento y Diseño UNR)

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
aurelio cossar
dante ausili
sofía giancarelli
alejandrina langhi

United States

roman montoto

Chile

mauricio léniz
bernardita léniz
felipe zelada

Chile

juan pablo badía
francisco de borja valdés
francisca yunis

China

Tongji University

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
shuyi huang
guanjie yao
yuan tian
xiaoya zhang

United Kingdom

raffaele palmieri
manuel zucchi

Japan

Kogakuin University Shinjuku Campus

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
dimitri azzarà
kazuki hasegawa
hiroto otaki
atsushi sakuramoto

Germany

FH Münster Fachbereich Architektur, MSA Muenster School of Architecture

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
clemens berresheim
alex kirschstein

Portugal

Oggo studio architects

julien gomes
sandra pinto

Hungary

Budapest University of Technology and Economics (Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem)

+126 points Buildner University Rankings!
hunor albert szántó
fanni zita salamin

Uruguay

pablo martínez rodríguez
camila coya dotta

France

joana correia
guillaume boitier

Japan

Waseda University Art and Architecture school

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
keisuke kobayashi

United Kingdom

Northumbria university

paul jones

France

ferzilet leti numani
jade apack

Indonesia

himawan prakoso
arief singgih wibowo
nur arsad eko pramono
ardyana fahmiadi

Japan

masato endo
shigeru yoshino
tomohiko watabe
natsumi nihei

Germany

flavio cucina
sara angellotti
francesca rubiu

Poland

mateusz binkowski
joanna targowicz

Japan

katsuya fukushima
hiroko tominaga
benjamin sykes thompson

Spain

ernesto urquízar quesada
maría cervantes lardón

Turkey

süleyman can Çinkılıç
cemil hamdi okumuş

Sweden

Faculty of Engineering, LTH , Lund University

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
arthur campling

Italy

angelo ancarola
antonio mastria
salvatore possidente del monte
luigi simone
 

Open architecture competitions

  • Closest Deadline first
  • Project competitions first
    Selected winning projects have the potential to be constructed
  • Ideas competitions first
    Experimental competitions with the focus on pushing the boundaries of creativity
ideas COMPETITION
The Architect's Chair
Edition #1

Take a seat and make a statement!

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 06
Sep 06
Nov 01
ideas COMPETITION
Beyond Isolation: Senior Housing
Senior living. Edition#2

Reimagine senior living spaces

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 08
Sep 08
Nov 02
project COMPETITION
The Legendary Highway 14 Tower
South Dakota, USA

Design an iconic tower for De Smet, South Dakota, USA

Prize: MONETARY AWARD + POTENTIAL TO BE REALISED
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 09
Sep 12
Nov 03
project COMPETITION
Iceland Beer Spa

Design a beer spa in Iceland's captivating landscape

Prize: MONETARY AWARD + POTENTIAL TO BE REALISED
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 14
Sep 14
Nov 08

Reccuring architecture competitions

ideas COMPETITION
Silent contest
For this competition, NO DESCRIPTION TEXT is allowed. The architecture ideas must be communicated strictly with visuals.
Museum of Emotions
Edition #4

Use architecture to create different emotional states

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Sep 27
Nov 28
Jan 30
ideas COMPETITION
Silent contest
For this competition, NO DESCRIPTION TEXT is allowed. The architecture ideas must be communicated strictly with visuals.
The Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial
Edition #3

Design a memorial that speaks to the cause of ending all nuclear weapons programs

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 26
Sep 03
Nov 05
ideas COMPETITION
Workplace Reimagined
Edition #3

Redefine the future of workspaces

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Sep 14
Nov 16
Jan 18
Run repeatedly
Los Angeles Affordable Housing Challenge
Affordable Housing Series #16

Design affordable housing solutions in Los Angeles

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 07
Sep 07
Nov 01
Register now

Please enter your email address to receive download link

Thank you!

The download link will be sent to your email shortly

please check the spam folder
in case you can not find it
OK

Competition results

MICROHOME

MICROHOME

Small living, huge impact! Edition #4
Hong Kong 
Pixel Homes

Hong Kong Pixel Homes

Affordable Housing Series #2
To access competion downloads please enter your email address:
OK
To access competion downloads please enter your email address:
OK
This website uses cookies for enhancing the user experience and tracking usage statistics.
More information is available in our Privacy Policy.