Introduction

Letter by Lord Norman Foster – President of the Norman Foster Foundation and Chairman of the Jury

 

Kharkiv, the second-largest city of Ukraine noted for its combination of culture, education, and industry, is a mere thirty kilometres from the Russian border. Its long-term masterplan is being created by a local and international team led by the Norman Foster Foundation. This followed a request for help by the mayor to me, in my role as Advocate for the United Nations Forum of Mayors in 2022. A team of global and local experts have since been working on a masterplan for the cities long term future. In parallel with master planning, a small number of shorter-term pilot projects have been identified including Freedom Square, one of the largest in the world and at the heart of the historic core of the city. One end of the space is dominated by the war damaged Regional Headquarters, an integral part of the competition brief. At the other end is the Derzhprom – a constructivist masterpiece of 1928 and a UNESCO World Heritage site.

With an awareness of the Berlin Reichstag the mayor initially asked me to undertake a similar working memorial for Kharkiv. Instead, I advocated a competition that would be open to Ukrainian and international architects, the results of which have now been evaluated by a jury of ten local and global experts led by the mayor and myself.


The conclusion of the jury is that no single entry addressed in a balanced and adequate manner the diverse needs of the key building and the public space. So, instead of a first, second and third prize the jury has given equal recognition and prize money to three outstanding projects for their different contributions. The winner of the separate category for students was one of the most outstanding entries – a worthy prize in its own right.


The competition is seen as a success, particularly by the local representatives, who found it valuable in starting to redefine their needs - symbolically as well as functionally. The importance of gravitas in any proposal was a theme that recurred in the discussions. The intention now is to create a second competition which will be open to new as well as previous entrants.

The jury were mindful that the final design for The Reichstag evolved from a competition that morphed into a second stage. The jury was united against those projects which sought to fill the civic space with multiple activities, summed up by one juror as the “Tivoli Gardens” approach. On the other hand, the jury expressed concerns about over monumentalising the space – for example with columns that marched the lengths of the square.

On behalf of the city of Kharkiv, the Mayor and his colleagues expressed their gratitude for the efforts of all of the participants and emphasised that the results of the competition will help to shape the future of the historic core of the city.


A New Vision for Kharkiv


The city of Kharkiv has faced significant challenges due to its proximity to the Russian border. Amidst these circumstances, Kharkiv’s Mayor, Ihor Terekhov, underscored the need for a new landmark during the United Nations’ Second Forum of Mayors—a project that could embody renewal, resilience, and hope. The Freedom Square International Competition was launched as part of this vision, inviting local and international experts to propose innovative designs for Freedom Square and the Kharkiv Regional State Administration Building.

This competition is part of the broader Kharkiv Masterplan Concept, an initiative led by the Kharkiv City Council in collaboration with the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the Norman Foster Foundation, Arup, and local architects and experts. The Masterplan Concept seeks to guide Kharkiv’s regeneration by fostering a vibrant, inclusive, and forward-looking urban environment while honoring the city’s historical identity


Freedom Square and the Kharkiv Regional State Administration Building


Freedom Square, one of Europe’s largest urban spaces, has long served as a cultural and civic centerpiece for Kharkiv. In the center of the square is the State Industrial Complex, built in 1928 after an international competition in 1925, a monument of the architectural avant-garde, often compared to Bauhaus designs. Also during this period, a unique spatial ensemble of Freedom Square was created, of which the Regional State Administration Building is a part of. This ensemble symbolizes an important moment in the history of modern architecture. Recent events have affected this historic area, including damage to both buildings. As part of a UNESCO World Heritage ensemble, these structures carry significant historical and cultural weight. The competition to preserve their symbolic and architectural value while reimagining Freedom Square as an inclusive and adaptable public space.


The Competition


The Kharkiv Freedom Square Revival Competition, organized by Buildner, the Norman Foster Foundation, the Kharkiv City Council, UNECE, and Arup, presented a unique platform for architects, urban planners, and designers worldwide. Announced on September 10, 2024, the competition aimed to develop visionary concepts for one of Kharkiv’s most iconic sites. This competition marks only the first step in the critical and responsible work of creating a comprehensive vision for Freedom Square, a central symbol of Kharkiv’s identity and resilience.

With a prize pool of €10,000, (3,000€ for each Prize Winner, 1,000€ for the Student Award) the competition encouraged designs that respected the city’s heritage while aligning with its aspirations for renewal and progress. It represents a pivotal step in shaping Kharkiv’s future, reflecting the city’s enduring resilience and commitment to creating a space that serves both its historical identity and its evolving needs. The Kharkiv Freedom Square Revival competition demonstrated a remarkable level of participation, receiving a total of 84 submissions from architects, designers, and urban planners worldwide. Notably, 21 submissions were from teams based in Ukraine, showcasing the strong involvement and dedication of Ukrainian architecture bureaus. These contributions underscore the critical role of local expertise in shaping the vision for one of Ukraine’s most iconic urban spaces while engaging a global audience to provide diverse perspectives. In addition to Ukraine, teams from other countries, including the United States of America, United Kingdom, Italy, India, Canada, Germany, Bangladesh, France, Israel, South Korea, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates, also participated in the competition.

The Kharkiv Freedom Square Revival competition showcased strong global participation and thoughtful contributions. The 10 jury members were from Ukraine, UK, India, Spain, Israel, and USA, representing fields such as Architecture, Urban Planning, Transport, and History. Accordingly, rather than identify one clear winner, and second and third places, the jury decided to give equal weighting and prize money to three projects of equal standing, whose ideas would contribute to a second stage competition, open to new entrants as well as those who had competed in the present competition.


Recognized Projects


The jury has recognized three prize winners as equal contributors to the ongoing dialogue about the future of Freedom Square and the Kharkiv Regional State Administration Building, alongside a standout student project. Each of these projects offers valuable ideas, highlighting diverse approaches to reimagining this iconic space. Their strengths and areas for improvement reflect the complexity of the design challenge and emphasize the richness of this endeavor.

Instead, these projects collectively serve as stepping stones toward a more balanced, inclusive, and inspiring outcome. The standout student project further underscores the importance of engaging emerging talent in shaping the city’s future, adding fresh perspectives and innovative ideas to the discourse. While the selected projects should not be seen as definitive solutions, they represent a foundation for continued exploration. Together, they fulfill the competition’s goal of sparking meaningful conversations and setting the stage for future efforts. This measured approach embraces the potential for these ideas to evolve into a comprehensive vision that reflects Kharkiv’s resilience, history, and aspirations for renewal.


Key reflections from the jury


An ambitious brief: The competition brief set forth ambitious goals, yet its broad scope left room for interpretation, leading to proposals that diverged significantly from the intended vision. Many participants did not fully align with the local context or site-specific realities, particularly in terms of practicality and the symbolic weight of the space.

Avoiding overprogramming: The jury expressed concern about projects that overly fragmented the square with excessive features, likening some to “Tivoli Gardens” in their attempt to fill the space with varied programming. This approach risked trivializing the symbolic and monumental essence of Freedom Square, which demands a balance between openness, gravitas, and functionality.

Balancing innovation and feasibility: While some proposals introduced imaginative and bold concepts, they often fell short in terms of feasibility, either due to technical constraints—such as Kharkiv’s complex underground infrastructure —or their limited adaptability to the needs of a large-scale civic gathering space.

Paving the way for future stages: The jury highlighted that, much like the multi- stage process of reimagining the Reichstag in Berlin, this competition should be viewed as a foundational step for the next stages of planning the Freedom Square and the Kharkiv Regional State Administration Building recovery. It establishes critical parameters for the next phase, including the need for clearer guidelines, deeper community engagement, and a sharper focus on Freedom Square’s symbolic, civic, and practical functions.


Moving Forward: A Broader Vision for Freedom Square


This competition marks the beginning of an inclusive and ongoing dialogue about the future of Freedom Square and the Kharkiv Regional State Administration Building. The projects recognized in this competition, along with several other compelling submissions, contribute valuable ideas that highlight both the complexities and opportunities of reimagining this iconic space.

While none fully resolves the design challenge, each offers unique insights that will inform future conversations and shape the next steps in this ambitious endeavor, which will integrate the strongest ideas from the recognized submissions. As part of these next steps, there are plans to consider launching a follow-up competition, incorporating the valuable feedback from jury members and proposals from this competition to refine the vision further.

Additionally, inspiration can be drawn from the process of reimagining the Reichstag in Berlin, as shared by Norman Foster. This transformative project involved conducting multiple competitions before arriving at a successful solution, demonstrating the importance of iterative and thoughtful planning in addressing complex challenges.

Ultimately, the success of this competition lies in its ability to frame a vision for Freedom Square that honors Kharkiv’s rich history, meets the needs of its present, and inspires its future. The jury commends the efforts of all participants and reaffirms the commitment to creating a space that reflects Kharkiv’s resilience, democratic values, and aspirations for renewal and prosperity. This competition is not an endpoint but a foundation for the transformative journey ahead.

 

- Lord Norman Foster – President of the Norman Foster Foundation and Chairman of the Jury

 

This competition was funded primarily by Buildner and was in part funded by BMZ and supported by GIZ. 


 


We sincerely thank our jury panel
for their time and expertise

Norman Foster

Norman Foster Foundation

Spain

Deborah Berke

TenBerke Architects

USA

Vishaan Chakrabarti

Practice for architecture and urbanism: PAU

USA

Beatriz Colomina

Director of Graduate Studies, PhD Program, School of Architecture, Princeton University

United States

Anupama Kundoo

Architect and Professor at TU Berlin

Germany

Maksim Rozenfeld

Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Arts, Kharkiv National University V. N.

Ukraine

Stuart Smith

Arup Berlin

Germany

Dr. Brinda Somaya

Somaya and Kalappa Consultants (SNK)

India

Moshe Safdie

Safdie Architects

USA

Ihor Terekhov

Mayor of Kharkiv

Ukraine

Three winning projects are presented in a random order

One of the three
Competition joint-winners

Project name

Memory

Author
Jansen Che
Country
Australia
Three winning projects are presented in a random order

One of the three
Competition joint-winners

Project name

In-time

Author
Daniel Mintz
Country
Israel
Three winning projects are presented in a random order

One of the three
Competition joint-winners

Project name

Norman Foster Foundation Kharkiv Freedom Square Revival - Garden state

Author
Nischal Ba
Country
India

Student Award

Project name

Kharkiv Freedom Square Revival-History & future

University
University of Sheffield
Author
Qiqi Wu
Country
United Kingdom
+72 points Buildner University Rankings

Shortlisted projects

Show Shortlisted projects Hide Shortlisted projects

In Memory of the People

Young Kang
United Kingdom

Freedom Square

Stanislav Shchetinin
Glib Khmelnytskyi
Dmytro Novikov
Ukraine

The Conversation

Paolo Bertolotti
United States

Green Bonds, Metal Grid

Alona Usychenko
Zuzanna Bućko

Warsaw University of Technology , Politechnika Warszawska

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Ukraine

In-time

Daniel Mintz
Israel

KHARKIV RECONNECTED

Chutian Liang
Zichen Huang
United States

Memory

Jansen Che
Australia

Freedom to Care, an Agora of Opportunities

Maria Ramild Crammond
Denmark

The Freedom Reshaped

Nesreen Ahmad
United Arab Emirates

Proposal for the revival of Freedom Square in Kharkiv

Anton Kuzmin
Ukraine

Imprint, Infill, & Incite

Yi yang Chai
Ng Yi Ming
Malaysia

Way of Ukrainian Independence Formation

Vitalii Sobchenko
Yaroslav Protsyk
Dmytrii Kupchyn
Ukraine

A Sweeping Dialogue

Koh Noguchi
Jun Sakamoto
Masaki Hattori
United Kingdom

Freedom Square Revival

Bahram Azizi
Canada

Civic Rhythms : history, innovation and community

Louis Paul Georges Chapsal
Ahmet Alper Gultekin
Toni Bosch Jerez
Switzerland

Evolving Heritage

Kelvin De Guzman Magno
Erika Ruth Lacanilao Florendo
Philippines

Freedom Square: historical memory and new urban visions

Francesco Moncagatto
Andrea Sportiello

DAD - Dipartimento Architettura e Design - UniGe , Università di Genova

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Italy

Zeitgeist

Mykyta Lytvynenko
Laurenz Schröder

Bauhaus - Universität Weimar

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Germany

Kharkiv Freedom Square Revival-History & future

Qiqi Wu
United Kingdom

Norman Foster Foundation Kharkiv Freedom Square Revival - Garden state

Nischal Ba
India