International Architecture Competition

The Home of
Shadows

Results

Foreword

Competition organisers

The Home of 
Shadows

Buildner is excited to share the results of its Home of Shadows Competition!

For this international event, participants were asked to design a home for a hypothetical couple with just one rule - there can be no artificial light within the home. The jury sought designs that effectively, innovatively and emotionally studied how natural light might influence and shape built space.

Buildner collaborated with an experienced international jury of architects that included: Guillaume Aubry, Cyril Gauthier and Yves Pasquet of FREAKS Architecture, a Paris-based architecture practice; Yu-Hsiang Fu is the Founder and Design Director of New York and Taipei based fws_work, an interior, branding and furniture design company whose recent project “Residence W” received Architizer A+ Awards and Dezeen Awards; Robert Hutchison of Robert Hutchison Architecture is a practitioner, researcher, and educator whose interests and practice overlap the fields of architecture, art and photography; Patcharada Inplang and Thongchai Chansamak are the founders of Chiangmai, Thailand-based Sher Maker; Flora Lee is an Associate Partner of MAD Architects who has helped develop and realize a number of MAD’s major international projects, including the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art in Los Angeles; Geoff Nees is a Melbourne based artist and curator with over 20 years of professional practice with a cross-disciplinary approach; Peter Newman is a London-based British artist working in a variety of media to make artworks exploring a human relationship to space and modernity; Aleksander Saša Ostan is a practicing architect and urban planner who runs the office Atelier Ostan Pavlin in Ljubljana, Slovenia; and Wu Ziye is co-founder of Nanjing, China-based Mix Architecture and Chartered Member of the Royal Institute of British Architects.

Buildner and its jury panel would like to thank each participating team for submitting their ideas and for sharing their exemplary graphic and communication techniques!

1st Prize Winner

Project name

Shadow and Shade

Authors

Maria Tîlvescu Nicula

Romania

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

You have the opportunity to challenge yourself to the maximum, refining and sharpening your skills, from the inception of the idea to the most expressive and honest way of conveying it. I have always believed that the anonymity offered by international architecture competitions is extremely important. Your situation or origin no longer matter; only your skills matter, and that, in my opinion, is a very beautiful and valuable thing. Additionally, I believe that by participating in and winning international competitions, I can inspire my students to do the same. Some of the best experiences in my career as an architect have emerged from competition-related circumstances, whether it's internships, masterclasses, collaboration offers, or simply interacting and learning from other architects around the world. Lastly, but certainly not least, I participate because it brings me great joy. I simply love doing it.

Jury feedback summary

Shadow and Shade is a proposal for a home carved or sculpted from rock-like volumes. It is ancient in nature and draws on the elemental themes of textured surfaces, a reflective pool and rounded forms to play with light and communicate a variety of private and shared atmospheres. The project comprises three primary formal elements: a perimetral wall which contains the site, atop which sits a sloped and massive ‘wing’ which forms a curved roof, and a series of open ring shaped spaces which gather like chapels along a common spine.

 

Geoff Nees / Buildner guest jury artist Australia
This proposal stands out for its organic and ephemeral nature, characterized by a natural and gentle interplay of light and shadow. To further enhance the presentation, the utilization of white space could have been beneficial. Incorporating well-placed areas of empty space would have refined the composition, allowing the design elements to breathe and ensuring a visually balanced and engaging presentation.
Aleksander Saša Ostan / Buildner guest jury Atelier Ostan Pavlin Slovenia
A fascinating sequence of spaces, bathed in different kinds of light, mostly indirect, embraced by an original, primordial structure. It combines feelings of prehistoric shelters with modern, open-air, organically designed homes. The less successful parts of the proposal are: lack of context, site, structural instability and impractical spaces without a view on the closed part of the house.
Yu-Hsiang Fu / Buildner guest jury founder and Design Director of fws_work USA, Taiwan
This project cleverly brings light into the space, not only considering the direction of sunlight, but also utilizing the reflection of water and curved surfaces. The renderings beautifully capture the light and shadows.

Buildner's architectural communication techniques review

Have a presentation for us to review? Order your review here!
  • 10/10
    Linework
  • 10/10
    Quality of drawings
  • 10/10
    Balance of color
  • 9/10
    Layout
  • 10/10
    Hierarchy
  • 6/10
    Annotation
  • 7/10
    Text
  • 9/10
    Clarity of story
  • 10/10
    Clarity of diagrams
  • 10/10
    Quality of overall presentation

Buildner's commentary and recommendations

The presentation balances rich, layered renderings with well-organized line drawings and simple diagrams which effectively communicate design intent: in this case the actions of sunlight and the potential variations between light and shadow. All the drawings exhibit a strong sense of hierarchy as well as a particularly effective materiality, which is never simple to achieve. The project would benefit from three items: 1) a more compact and impactful use of text to simply describe main ideas; 2) annotation on all imagery to communicate key spaces, materials, basic dimensional considerations, and other design elements; and an enlarged sectional or material detail to hint at the constructability of the project and to provoke an enhanced architectural dialogue. 

 

2nd Prize Winner

Project name

Tuna

Authors

Rodrigo Galvez
Estefania Miralles

Guatemala

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

Architectural skills provide us with the opportunity to consistently exercise high levels of conceptualization for a project. Based on the results we achieve in a competition, we can identify areas for improvement and necessary changes to refine both the project itself and its presentation format.

Jury feedback summary

TUNA draws its namesake from a species of sweet fruit of Guatemalan origin, considered to be a delicacy. As one might relish the special nature of such a fruit, the user of this proposed building might relish the light she is afforded by its considered design. The project consists of a series of simple concrete cube-shaped volumes of various sizes, organized to follow the typical daily activities of a Guatemalan farmer. The majority of the spaces are connected concentrically about a central, top-lit courtyard, while a separate bathroom volume is topped by a rain collection tank which serves its fixtures.

Peter Newman / Buildner guest jury artist UK
Timeless and monolithic, the project proposes a simple and harmonious relationship to the land on which it stands.
Flora Lee / Buildner guest jury Associate Partner of MAD Architects USA
The use of intentionally articulated lighting creates a poetic effect.
Aleksander Saša Ostan / Buildner guest jury Atelier Ostan Pavlin Slovenia
A sustainable, regional and poetic answer to everyday life challenges in a rural context of Guatemala. Poetic, symbolic, but with an archeoastronomic use of light and shadow.

Buildner's architectural communication techniques review

Have a presentation for us to review? Order your review here!
  • 8/10
    Linework
  • 8/10
    Quality of drawings
  • 9/10
    Balance of color
  • 8/10
    Layout
  • 9/10
    Hierarchy
  • 7/10
    Annotation
  • 6/10
    Text
  • 8/10
    Clarity of story
  • 9/10
    Clarity of diagrams
  • 8/10
    Quality of overall presentation

Buildner's commentary and recommendations

The project employs a series of simple plans and axonometrics overlaid on renderings. A single full-span image is effective at describing the project form, materiality and context, while three supporting diagrams provide insight into the varying sequences of daylight within the building over the course of a calendar day. The project would benefit from an expanded use of text to more poetically tell the story that is hinted at in imagery - the current use of text is rather dry and uninspired. The presentation would also be augmented with additional annotation to describe basic architectural principles such as an organizational or dimensional grid, as well as textual notes to describe the function of the spaces depicted in each of the images.

 

3rd Prize Winner

Project name

The Circadian House

Authors

Irina Ivancu
Catinca Joita
Daniel Oancea

Romania

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

We enjoy participating in architecture competitions because, to us, it feels like play. Regardless of the outcome, it is a wonderful experience to derive joy from the process of designing, particularly as a group of close friends.

Jury feedback summary

The Circadian House is a linear volume designed around the daily activities of the couple it houses, beginning and ending with the bedroom at sunrise and sunset. Its translucent envelope “breathes” the sun over the course of the day, transmitting and reflecting its changing intensities and colors. Connections with natural elements are vital, and the project includes gardens as well as a rooftop pool.

Guillaume Aubry, Cyril Gauthier, Yves Pasquet / Buildner guest jury FREAKS France
The cuts and schemes show a very precise study on lights and give the overall proposal a very sensitive feeling served by the renderings.
Robert Hutchison / Buildner guest jury Robert Hutchison Architecture USA
While there's a lot of things going on in this project, the long linear plan supports the written narrative of providing a path for waking, eating and sleeping over the course of a day, and the combination of the translucent facade with a opaque structure results in a rich spatial experience full of light, water and garden. A series of transverse sections would have helped clarify the proposal.
Patcharada Inplang / Buildner guest jury Sher Maker Thailand
This design plays with indirect light and sunken architecture to impact the feeling of light and shadow. It merges lighting design, architecture and land.

Buildner's architectural communication techniques review

Have a presentation for us to review? Order your review here!
  • 8/10
    Linework
  • 10/10
    Quality of drawings
  • 9/10
    Balance of color
  • 10/10
    Layout
  • 10/10
    Hierarchy
  • 6/10
    Annotation
  • 8/10
    Text
  • 8/10
    Clarity of story
  • 9/10
    Clarity of diagrams
  • 9/10
    Quality of overall presentation

Buildner's commentary and recommendations

The single-sheet submission is sophisticated in its simple, logical layout. Advanced imagery is balanced with effective hand sketches which highlight the project’s fundamental concepts. The project would be considered more complete with the inclusion of basic site or contextual information to enhance the reader’s understanding of the building’s connection to nature. In terms of annotation, simple material callouts to clarify the design intent of the building’s envelope and structure would also enhance the submission’s viability as a realisable architectural project.

 

BUILDNER STUDENT AWARD +
BUILDNER SUSTAINABILITY AWARD

Project name

Light, House, Nomad

Authors

Doyeob Woo
Gunhee Song
Seongmok Choi

University

Hanyang university

South Korea

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

We have reviewed the notice on your site and become interested in the house without artificial light. After the development of artificial light, architectural forms have been simplified. Therefore, we believe that if a house does not rely on artificial light, it could potentially have a more creative and practical design to address the lighting challenge. We were intrigued by this concept.

Jury feedback summary

Light House Nomad is a proposal for a project based in the desert of Algeria. According to the submission, it is an example of architecture formed by sunlight, enveloped in a tent-like and double-curved surface that serves as a filter for direct and ambient light. Within a single open space, islands of light yielded by openings in the roof above organise the layout and active versus inactive zones for its nomadic inhabitants.

Thongchai Chansamak / Buildner guest jury Sher Maker Thailand
Nowadays a lot of architects try to do very complicated things to design a nice living atmosphere. This design uses very basic methods of light control to define a living space underneath a temporary shelter. Flows of activity in the space relate to light and shadow directly.
Geoff Nees / Buildner guest jury artist Australia
The correlation between light intensity and architectural density in this design is intriguing. However, one notable weakness is the excessive emphasis on the graphic language, which hampers the legibility of the underlying concept. While the graphic elements contribute to aesthetics, it's important to strike a balance between artistic expression and functionality. By refining the graphic language without compromising concept clarity, the proposal can achieve a more cohesive and impactful outcome.
Wu Ziye / Buildner guest jury co-founder of Mix Architecture China
The design follows the local climate and architectural culture, and separates spaces through the shaping of light. It is interesting and logical. It is feasible and flexible for a variety of scenarios and multiple requirements.

Buildner's architectural communication techniques review

Have a presentation for us to review? Order your review here!
  • 10/10
    Linework
  • 10/10
    Quality of drawings
  • 9/10
    Balance of color
  • 10/10
    Layout
  • 9/10
    Hierarchy
  • 10/10
    Annotation
  • 8/10
    Text
  • 10/10
    Clarity of story
  • 10/10
    Clarity of diagrams
  • 10/10
    Quality of overall presentation

Buildner's commentary and recommendations

The project is unique in the quality and techniques used to produce its drawings. Consisting completely of line drawings it stands out from typical project submissions in its advanced use of densities and fills to create variation and, consequently, provide hierarchy and balance to the sheet. Given its intent, it would be useful to include an image depicting a ‘dark zone’ within the project to provide a more complete understanding of the range of its spatial experiences. Additional information as to the material connections / joints and material makeup would yield more insight into the possibilities and limitations of the envelope, and likely provide the author with a better set of tools by which to develop the project further.

 

Honorable mentions

VIEWclose HONOURABLE MENTIONS

Project Name

The Starry Ring

University

Xi'an university of architecture and technology
+72 points Buildner University Rankings!

Country

China

Project authors

Xiangxian Lee
Jiayi Lee
Runzhe Gao

Project Name

Soft Box

University

Faculty of engineering, lth , lund university
+72 points Buildner University Rankings!

Country

Sweden

Project authors

Klara Johnsson
Emil Klaar
Frida Sandberg

Project Name

Lit Haven

University

Tarumanagara university, untar - universitas tarumanagara
+72 points Buildner University Rankings!

Country

Indonesia

Project authors

Frans Michael
Madeline Louis
Juan Nathanie Wilianto
Daniel

Project Name

VALOISA COTTAGE

Country

Spain

Project authors

Barbara Bruschi
Jade Näsi

Project Name

Off the grid

University

Goldsmiths, university of london
+72 points Buildner University Rankings!

Country

United Kingdom

Project authors

Jiayi Wu
Yi Xu
Ningyue Wang

Project Name

Casa Obscura

Country

United States

Project authors

Jeremy Iannucci

Shortlisted projects

VIEWclose Shortlisted projects

France

colin fournier
aidan newsome
yufan zhang
lorenz kleemann

Canada

alex fown
cayley black

Italy

University of Camerino (UNICAM) , Unicam - Università di Camerino

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
debora di francesco
doni hallko

Romania

maria tîlvescu nicula

South Korea

hyunjun kim
jihyung kim

United States

University of Kansas

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
nolan lodholz

China

Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
xiangxian lee
jiayi lee
runzhe gao

Norway

olga skrbenska

China

Southeast University, China

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
siying liang
elise zhan
yuanfeng luo

South Africa

The university of johannesburg

kimal osman
chinenye chukwuka
saalihah kolia
zubair meeah

Indonesia

Tarumanagara University, Untar - Universitas Tarumanagara

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
frans michael
madeline louis
juan nathanie wilianto
daniel

China

Xiamen University

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
zhaowei lin
qixuan hu
yurong jin
yu lei

China

Huazhong University of Science and Technology

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
yitao zhong
ruijie yan
ziyang han
jieruo zhang

Finland

KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
katja teinilä

South Korea

Hanyang university

doyeob woo
gunhee song
seongmok choi

United Kingdom

Goldsmiths, University of London

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
jiayi wu
yi xu
ningyue wang

United Kingdom

University of Edinburgh

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
ruoxin tan
jingzhi he
jiayu lu

Vietnam

Hanoi Architectural University

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
ba hung nguyen
van trung bui
hai dang tang
khoi nguyen phuc minh

Spain

alexandru ciubotaru
wellington franzao

Netherlands

hazem elshafei
ali el sabaawi
daana bolot

United States

thakan navapakpilai
lalinthip maholarnkij

Thailand

Silpakorn University

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
bhathara prapunwattana
pawiz kaewstitpornchai
phakaphong karawek

Switzerland

EPFL École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
klea ott
arthur stepczynski

United Kingdom

sooyeon jeong
taeyeon kim

United States

jeremy iannucci

Poland

Wroclaw University of Science and Technology (Politechnika Wrocławska)

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
kinga kopczyk
sara gorczyńska

Romania

Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism - UAUIM

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
irina melinte
andra urzica
liana gavrila

Spain

laura de la mata morales
luis felipe pérez villanueva

South Korea

youngil kim

Poland

Wroclaw University of Science and Technology (Politechnika Wrocławska)

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
julia sielska
gabriela gustaw

Romania

delia cuciurean

Sweden

Faculty of Engineering, LTH , Lund University

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
samuel grandin karlsson

Romania

irina ivancu
catinca joita
daniel oancea

Vietnam

hoa vu

United States

jake heffington
emily fiedler
eli simaan

Guatemala

rodrigo galvez
estefania miralles

Sweden

Faculty of Engineering, LTH , Lund University

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
klara johnsson
emil klaar
frida sandberg

South Korea

Dong-a University

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
seon jae kim
ji won kim

Italy

Politecnico di Milano / Polytechnic University of Milan

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
ada yildirim
chris david wang

Spain

barbara bruschi
jade näsi
 

Open architecture competitions

  • Closest Deadline first
  • Project competitions first
    Selected winning projects have the potential to be constructed
  • Ideas competitions first
    Experimental competitions with the focus on pushing the boundaries of creativity
ideas COMPETITION
The Architect's Chair
Edition #1

Take a seat and make a statement!

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 06
Sep 06
Nov 01
ideas COMPETITION
Beyond Isolation: Senior Housing
Senior living. Edition#2

Reimagine senior living spaces

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 08
Sep 08
Nov 02
project COMPETITION
The Legendary Highway 14 Tower
South Dakota, USA

Design an iconic tower for De Smet, South Dakota, USA

Prize: MONETARY AWARD + POTENTIAL TO BE REALISED
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 09
Sep 12
Nov 03
project COMPETITION
Iceland Beer Spa

Design a beer spa in Iceland's captivating landscape

Prize: MONETARY AWARD + POTENTIAL TO BE REALISED
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 14
Sep 14
Nov 08

Reccuring architecture competitions

ideas COMPETITION
Silent contest
For this competition, NO DESCRIPTION TEXT is allowed. The architecture ideas must be communicated strictly with visuals.
The Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial
Edition #3

Design a memorial that speaks to the cause of ending all nuclear weapons programs

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 26
Sep 03
Nov 05
ideas COMPETITION
Workplace Reimagined
Edition #3

Redefine the future of workspaces

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Sep 14
Nov 16
Jan 18
ideas COMPETITION
Silent contest
For this competition, NO DESCRIPTION TEXT is allowed. The architecture ideas must be communicated strictly with visuals.
Museum of Emotions
Edition #4

Use architecture to create different emotional states

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Sep 27
Nov 28
Jan 30
Run repeatedly
Los Angeles Affordable Housing Challenge
Affordable Housing Series #16

Design affordable housing solutions in Los Angeles

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 07
Sep 07
Nov 01
Register now

Please enter your email address to receive download link

Thank you!

The download link will be sent to your email shortly

please check the spam folder
in case you can not find it
OK

Competition results

MICROHOME

MICROHOME

Small living, huge impact! Edition #4
Hong Kong 
Pixel Homes

Hong Kong Pixel Homes

Affordable Housing Series #2
To access competion downloads please enter your email address:
OK
To access competion downloads please enter your email address:
OK
This website uses cookies for enhancing the user experience and tracking usage statistics.
More information is available in our Privacy Policy.