Architectural Volumetric Composition Competition

Gaudi La Coma
Artists’ Residences

Results

Foreword

Competition organisers

Gaudi La Coma 
Artists’ Residences

Official Partners

Gaudi La Coma 
Artists’ Residences

Buildner is pleased to announce the results of its Gaudi La Coma Artists’ Residences International Competition!

This is the first in a series of design competitions to be run in partnership with the Gaudi Knowledge Association and Inngenium Lab to celebrate Gaudi’s intellectual heritage. For this competition, participants were asked to submit proposals for a sustainable artists’ residence and education complex to be located in Huesca, Spain, designed in alignment with Antoni Gaudi’s principles of sustainability, functionality, aesthetics and innovation. Buildner and its jury sought designs that have the potential to become iconic landmarks while still remaining sensitive to the site’s natural surroundings.

Buildner worked with an outstanding jury consisting of a mix of Spanish and international architects to evaluate and select the winning entries: Bárbara Bardin and Julio Cano are co-founders of Madrid-based studio Canobardin; Julien De Smedt is the founder and director of JDS Architects based in Copenhagen and Brussels; Arturo Mc Clean is Communications Manager and Architect at Barcelona-based Miralles Tagliabue EMBT; Inés Olavarrieta is an architect and designer at Madrid-based selgascano; Anna Maria Orrù is an Affiliated Senior Lecturer at Konstfack – University of Arts, Crafts and Design with a focus on sustainability, and co-founder and co-director of Nordic Biomimicry; and Patricia Grande is Project Manager and Partner at Nieto Sobejano Arquitectos

Buildner and its jury panel would like to thank each of the participants and teams from around the globe who submitted proposals for this event.

1st Prize Winner

Project name

Opus Loci

Authors

Nathanaël Pinard
Marc Viaud
Victor Dussap
Félix Roudier-Canler

Company

Collectif carré noir

France

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

We are extremely glad about this result, and we hope that this success will enable us to develop our collective. At the very least, the competition will help us create common basis for our urban and architectural approach, and debate about the shared values that we want to express across our architectural practice.

Jury feedback summary

‘Opus Loci’ maps local resources within a 100km radius to serve the design and construction of this project. Programs are organized to prioritize interactions between artist production and living spaces, visitor’s reception and sleeping areas and interactive spaces. The project is modular and follows three templates, sized small, medium and large, which are located across the site in consideration of the existing landscape. Each module is organized around a chimney block which provides space heating, hot water and regulates the immediate atmosphere in conformity with bioclimatic principles. The project utilizes raw earth and material reuse, incorporating an on-site workspace for self-construction. 

 

Julien De Smedt / Buildner guest jury founder and director of JDS Architects Denmark
Even if the scheme has some issues, the drawings manage to convey such liveliness that it's easy to imagine the creative capacity of their author.
Anna Maria Orrù / Buildner guest jury Co-founder/director, Nordic Biomimicry and Affiliated Senior Lecturer in design ecology, Konstfack Sweden
This project pays attention and care to look at local resources, local materials and re-use. A good strategic interlinking with the local community, giving opportunities for the residents and locals to meet and interact. I like that the project thinks of future drought needs by studying rainwater, flows and irrigation of new planted landscapes.
Patricia Grande / Buildner guest jury Project Manager and Partner, Nieto Sobejano Arquitectos Germany
It is an architecture that starts from the local. The proposal uses local materials and integrates with the environment. The small-scale architecture gives a global solution to the whole. The proposal is respectful of the landscape and uses this landscape as a sustainable production system.

Buildner's architectural communication techniques review

Have a presentation for us to review? Order your review here!
  • 10/10
    Linework
  • 10/10
    Quality of drawings
  • 9/10
    Balance of color
  • 8/10
    Layout
  • 8/10
    Hierarchy
  • 8/10
    Annotation
  • 8/10
    Text
  • 10/10
    Clarity of story
  • 10/10
    Clarity of diagrams
  • 9/10
    Quality of overall presentation

Buildner's commentary and recommendations

The project is remarkable for its unique drawings and its level of detail and complexity. Such complexity communicates the author’s extensive analysis of the project, its site and the design. There is a level of graphic strength here that certainly goes above and beyond the typical competition submission. There are a number of presentation considerations, however, that the author might make. Text is located only on the first sheet - it is lengthy and far too small for easy comprehension. Given the submission spans four sheets, it is recommended that this text be divided onto multiple pages and increased in size for more direct correlations between drawing and descriptions, and also to provide a clearer flow and engagement for the reader. The final three sheets, while spectacular for their use of imagery, are quite similar in detailing and in the information conveyed. It would be beneficial for the author to increase in size the round vignettes, which provide clear differentiation within the project - it is within these that the reader is seeking to understand the spatial experience.

2nd Prize Winner

Project name

Parc Modernisme'

Authors

Matthew Pratt

United Kingdom

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

Architectural competitions allow a sense of freedom to test my own ideas and inventions, free from client constraints and agendas of office life. To me, they provide the perfect training and challenge of my own architectural ability and provide a welcome break for architectural self-reflection.

Jury feedback summary

Park Modernisme explores Gaudi’s architectural, structural and philosophical works and attempts to test these in a contemporary context. The project avoids a single architectural expression and instead creates a taxonomy of various forms and designs to explore variety in Gaud’s own works. The forms retain recurring themes to aid in achieving compositional cohesion. The site is considered as an inhabitable landscape, and the plan is designed to encourage exploration: one meanders on a network of paths to discover a wide spectrum of architectural forms and plant species. To respect scale and local context, program elements are broken down to their most basic components. 

Anna Maria Orrù / Buildner guest jury Co-founder/director, Nordic Biomimicry and Affiliated Senior Lecturer in design ecology, Konstfack Sweden
An explorative inhabited landscape and building compositions that are truelly in the spirit of Gaudi both in Form, Movement, Shape and Nature connection. Rests well in the landscape and good approach to 'break up' programme elements. Easy access, configuration and relation to the landscape and cascading terraces. Good move to re-use the existing materials on -site, but also the sustainable chimney-stack ventilation efforts to cool and use natural air/wind to keep the spaces ventilated. The structures are simply stunning and fit so well with the objective of this call and to provide the structure needed.
Arturo Mc Clean / Buildner guest jury Architect at Barcelona based Miralles Tagliabue EMBT Spain
The proposal is a very clear transformation of Gaudi's principles in a magical and functional place. The drawings and graphics are very clear and drive you into every aspect of the project which is very likely to become an attractive landmark in the village.
Bárbara Bardin / Buildner guest jury Co-Founder of Madrid-based studio Canobardin Spain
This proposal shows in a coherent way many of the values of Gaudi's architecture. It shows a natural way of organization and growth of the plan, as well as the structure of the volumes organized by the anti-funicular principals.

Buildner's architectural communication techniques review

Have a presentation for us to review? Order your review here!
  • 9/10
    Linework
  • 9/10
    Quality of drawings
  • 8/10
    Balance of color
  • 8/10
    Layout
  • 9/10
    Hierarchy
  • 10/10
    Annotation
  • 9/10
    Text
  • 9/10
    Clarity of story
  • 9/10
    Clarity of diagrams
  • 9/10
    Quality of overall presentation

Buildner's commentary and recommendations

The project makes good use of a primary rendered image on each sheet supported by various diagrams and ancillary images in support of the key ideas. The texts are short and adequate for describing a range of topics and so these lend to an overall clarity. Small reference photographs help to communicate the project's strong analysis of precedents. The drawings, overall layout and color balance all vary quite a bit across the four sheets for a slightly jarring read as one reviews the project as a whole. This could be resolved globally with a reorganization of imagery and touch up of colors for more standardization, especially across the final three sheets. Given the extreme variation in design of the three building ‘types’ it would benefit the author to create a more uniform way of describing plans and sections. A single graphic method and scale would best be employed across the three types to yield more compositional cohesion for the presentation.

3rd Prize Winner

Project name

THE METABOLISM OF RAW EARTH

Authors

Delong Yang
Rixi Ye
Rongjie Zhang
Dan Liang

China

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

Our team members include professional architect, young scholars, and students, and we are consistently exploring what design is and what architecture is. Participating in competitions helps us make these discoveries. We exchanged existing design principles during these processes, discovered new design methodologies, and disputed new techniques and materials. Regarding architecture as a living organism, and giving each part of the building a definition in biology is the new methodology we found, and is effective for connecting each part.

Jury feedback summary

This proposal analyzes cell structure growth patterns to generate forms for the architecture and landscape design, considering these both as living systems that are constantly metabolizing. It responds to the site contours for the placement of many amorphous and free-form buildings that make use of raw earth construction. The project is designed on a flexible module to permit long-term growth with future new construction and expansion.

Anna Maria Orrù / Buildner guest jury Co-founder/director, Nordic Biomimicry and Affiliated Senior Lecturer in design ecology, Konstfack Sweden
A good use of biomimicry inspired by cell structures and behaviors. I would encourage the author to take this thinking further. Reusing raw earth and heritage of this practice is a unique move.
Inés Olavarrieta / Buildner guest jury Architect and designer at selgascano Spain
The project displays a very firm intention to maintain the existing topography while seeking to identify itself as highly differentiated elements, with a powerful architectural impact.
Arturo Mc Clean / Buildner guest jury Architect at Barcelona based Miralles Tagliabue EMBT Spain
The parallels with other disciplines are well developed in terms of possibility of growth and transformation. The zero-sum material change is an innovative proposal in terms of sustainability and life cycle. However, the relationship with the landscape and the surroundings is unsolved.

Buildner's architectural communication techniques review

Have a presentation for us to review? Order your review here!
  • 8/10
    Linework
  • 9/10
    Quality of drawings
  • 7/10
    Balance of color
  • 7/10
    Layout
  • 7/10
    Hierarchy
  • 8/10
    Annotation
  • 7/10
    Text
  • 8/10
    Clarity of story
  • 8/10
    Clarity of diagrams
  • 7/10
    Quality of overall presentation

Buildner's commentary and recommendations

The submission is commendable for the strength of its drawings which communicate well a complex idea that is unique and carried through all aspects of the project. The sheet presentation is, however, overly dense and could be construed as confusing or lacking cohesion due to its wide range of drawing types, graphic styles and layout choices. The sheets vary so dramatically from one to the next it might even appear as if completed by several different designers. The second and fourth sheets in particular would benefit from intelligent reduction and reorganization. The historical site analysis and analysis on Gaudi’s design values are common across all project entries and thus unnecessary to explain in such lengthy detail here. This could perhaps be included in a portfolio which is often read by those unaware of a project’s brief, but should be avoided in a competition entry where space is precious. The final sheet is inundated with renderings and formal analyses - it lacks hierarchy and is thus difficult for a juror to make sense of. The sheet would benefit from a limited number of drawings that describe key ideas and spaces and which more clearly leads a reader through these points.

BUILDNER STUDENT AWARD

Project name

Vine Art District

Authors

Myungju Ko
Seonggeun Hur

University

Gsapp, columbia university graduate school of architecture
+72 points Buildner University Rankings!

United States

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

Architecture competition is field of opportunity to testify your architectural knowledge and aesthetic perception through out rapid pace of design process. From this process, you can strengthen your design ability by exploring yourself to the ocean of idea that you have never experienced. Also, it is the best resource for us to express our design capability to the public. Exposing our work throughout renowned medium can give us opportunity to develop ourselves as young architects.

Jury feedback summary

Vine Art District is a project which draws principally from Gaudi’s focus on gravity and nature. It poses two gravity-response systems, one being that ‘mankind’ in the form of a CLT and steel truss structure; the other being that of ‘nature’ in the form of suspended elements, as if planted vines on a tree. The building takes the form of an arc in plan, shaped to conform with the topography, fitted with a linear CLT structural grid. From this structure various programmatic elements are suspended, organized around a pathway among private artist spaces and public spaces.

Julien De Smedt / Buildner guest jury founder and director of JDS Architects Denmark
An ambitious use of wood as structure and gentle materiality for a project that offers an integration of landscape and programs.
Julio Cano / Buildner guest jury founder of canobardin Spain
The monumentality of the interiors with the repetitive rhythm of the structure is almost like a reinterpretation of a cathedral.
Bárbara Bardin / Buildner guest jury Co-Founder of Madrid-based studio Canobardin Spain
It shows in a contemporary way a light bending structure. The materials, all raw and natural as well as the light, compose a space that could almost be monumental.

Buildner's architectural communication techniques review

Have a presentation for us to review? Order your review here!
  • 10/10
    Linework
  • 9/10
    Quality of drawings
  • 10/10
    Balance of color
  • 10/10
    Layout
  • 10/10
    Hierarchy
  • 10/10
    Annotation
  • 9/10
    Text
  • 10/10
    Clarity of story
  • 10/10
    Clarity of diagrams
  • 10/10
    Quality of overall presentation

Buildner's commentary and recommendations

This is an outstanding presentation with clear, crafted imagery and simple text; supportive diagrams correspond with both. Regarding the diagrams on the introductory page which depict vine growth: it is not immediately clear how this translates into the project structural design. This diagram series would benefit from a fourth and final image which directly links the vine concept with the structural concept. The long section and corresponding rendering are an excellent pairing that describe the project well. The section drawing would benefit from a reduced line density and a more clear difference in the hierarchy of line weights. It is also not clear how the interior program spaces relate to one another. The ‘ground’ line could be increased in weight to clearly mark the cut and to describe the site’s varying topography. Thicknesses of walls and ceilings relative to the overall structure seem unrealistically thin - it is recommended these are built up to show layering of materials and structure. Finally, the axonometric on the third page has clear line weights and describes well the building construction systems. The landscape in the background, however, confuses the upper portion of the image. It is recommended that the author ‘fade away’ or remove the site components here to strengthen the image.

BUILDNER SUSTAINABILITY AWARD

Project name

Canopy

Authors

Michael Kan
Kelly Tanim
Kevin Chen

University

University of edinburgh

United Kingdom

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

We think that architecture competition is a really productive way for students to experience the architectural design workflow in the real world. The brief requirement is very detailed yet imaginative enough for us to propose progressive solutions that can best suit the social and cultural context. This is very similar to how professional architects are encountered in everyday scenarios. Given the immense time limitation, it also encourages us to work collaboratively and think outside of the box, while compiling it in a professional manner. The process of design also helps to strengthen our graphic and digital skills in a short time, such learning progress is very important in our education in the future.

Jury feedback summary

‘Canopy’ references the natural forest, where a tree can both shelter and draw water from its environment. The project’s canopy and its relationship to the forest parallels Gaudi’s work and fascination with structure and the natural world. A canopy is employed to shelter the various programmatic parts of the project and it employs a structural grid that permits flexibility. The canopy collects rainwater which flows to a retention pond designed to irrigate surrounding landscape vegetation.

Arturo Mc Clean / Buildner guest jury Architect at Barcelona based Miralles Tagliabue EMBT Spain
The design is simple but effective. One innovative and sustainable element sheltering all the activities has the potentiality to become a powerful social hub. The design strategy is well expressed and it appears constructable and realizable. The proposal is sustainable in various ways, from the social point of view, to the environmental.
Julio Cano / Buildner guest jury founder of canobardin Spain
This proposal is not only inspired by Gaudi's architecture, but also by other modern architects that looked at Gaudi's works, such as Corrales y Molezún. This is a nice exercise in which a big nerved and reticular ceiling allows the space below to be open for all kinds of programs. It considers a smaller footprint for its energy requirements as well as how to make the most of natural resources in the architecture.
Bárbara Bardin / Buildner guest jury Co-Founder of Madrid-based studio Canobardin Spain
The contrast between the earthy material with the brick wall constructions and the lightness of the CLT timber structure is good. This proposal actually thinks about the CLT structure roof as an ecosystem that isolates the spaces below, allows proper ventilation and collects water. It is a beautiful and efficient way of achieving sustainability and functionality.

Buildner's architectural communication techniques review

Have a presentation for us to review? Order your review here!
  • 9/10
    Linework
  • 10/10
    Quality of drawings
  • 10/10
    Balance of color
  • 10/10
    Layout
  • 10/10
    Hierarchy
  • 10/10
    Annotation
  • 8/10
    Text
  • 10/10
    Clarity of story
  • 10/10
    Clarity of diagrams
  • 10/10
    Quality of overall presentation

Buildner's commentary and recommendations

The submission is evidence of the capacity for a strong and clean layout to communicate with a jury. Its use of clear headlines, concise but sufficient text and ample annotation all lend to its easy comprehension. The text could be given slightly more strength with the use of a darker color or bolder font to facilitate readability. This applies both to the introductory text on the first sheet as well as annotation on the site plan, which becomes lost in the colored graphics beyond. The final page excellently relates detailed sections with corresponding renderings, with advanced color balance and clear hierarchy.

Client Favorite

Project name

The Common Ground

Authors

Phoebe Tse

University

University of adelaide
+22 points Buildner University Rankings!

Australia

Why do you enter architecture
competitions?

Working in competitions challenge me to jump out of my comfort zone. To work on projects that are in a different context than my usual work. It is also a great way to test out my skills in problem-solving and graphic communication.

Honorable mentions

VIEWclose HONOURABLE MENTIONS

Project Name

La Coma Hive

Company

Artes london

Country

United Kingdom

Project authors

Alexander Herrera-rojas
Kasia Ziolkowska
Rafael Dominguez

Project Name

In nome di Gaudì

Company

Urges srl

Country

Italy

Project authors

Ekaterina Ivanova
Pietro Giromini

Project Name

A Local Symbol

Country

France

Project authors

Mohamed Ait oual
Phan Dang phan

Project Name

Natural Neural Networks

University

University of adelaide
+72 points Buildner University Rankings!

Country

Australia

Project authors

Yue Liu

Project Name

embedded grounds

Country

South Korea

Project authors

Kwang Hoon Lee
So Jung Lee
Jeongwoo Kim

Project Name

Harvest Arches

University

Monash university
+72 points Buildner University Rankings!

Country

Australia

Project authors

Franny Chang
Erin Judkins

Shortlisted projects

VIEWclose Shortlisted projects

Spain

Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
daler sofia alvarez medina

Australia

University of Adelaide

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
rose niakan

British Indian Ocean Trty.

Atelier array

aaradhana aiyappa
pragati nayak
purvi sharma
joel joseph

United States

asa barak
daniel cazap
sofia modesti funes
romy zheng

Spain

Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
melissa cordova argueta
raquel arnaiz

France

mohamed ait oual
phan dang phan

Spain

Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
sergio bernier
abel juarez
isuí rodriguez

Spain

Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
ignacio pardo de santayana

Spain

Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
gabriel mascaraque navarro

Spain

Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
marina del barrio
paula fernández-layos

Israel

De la fontaine architects ltd.

refael de la fontaine
dima zaretsky
miran calmanovici

South Korea

kwang hoon lee
so jung lee
jeongwoo kim

United Kingdom

Artes london

alexander herrera-rojas
kasia ziolkowska
rafael dominguez

United Kingdom

jingyang huang
yu zhou tong
zeng jian wei
dan liang

China

delong yang
rixi ye
rongjie zhang
dan liang

United Kingdom

University of Edinburgh

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
chang yang
leyang ding
jiayu lu

United Kingdom

University of edinburgh

michael kan
kelly tanim
kevin chen

United Kingdom

University of Edinburgh

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
sabrina findlay
delan aribigbola
cristian liu chang

United Kingdom

University of Edinburgh

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
bartu tort
allegra keys
ellis shiels

France

Collectif carré noir

nathanaël pinard
marc viaud
victor dussap
félix roudier-canler

Japan

ryo murata
isabelle nobayashi
chenyin xu
hiroki moriya

Indonesia

irwan arifin lubis
clarisa amanda baker
alifa azzahra nasution
reynaldi azmi

Indonesia

atikah rizkiyah
deden ikbaltrus kaban
rafiqah zhafirah siregar
keumala shatila harahap

Australia

University of Adelaide

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
yue liu

Indonesia

laviana tan
kristin regina
devin defriza harisdani
puguh ramos swardana

Bulgaria

UACEG , University of Architecture, Civil Eng. and Geodesy

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
maria pepelanova

Australia

University of Adelaide

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
jared clark

Italy

aurora chiara ianniello
paolo mezzadri
chiara felice
lucia concetta vincelli

Germany

catalina adelgoss-mejia
david geiman

Australia

University of Adelaide

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
phoebe tse

Puerto Rico

orlando echevarría garcía
jean c vega díaz

Philippines

gerard thomas joson
kiel aranda
amado magne ii lopez
karlson spencer ty

South Korea

Yonsei University

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
eunseo choi
myungsun kim

Australia

Monash University

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
franny chang
erin judkins

United States

GSAPP, Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
myungju ko
seonggeun hur

Italy

Urges srl

ekaterina ivanova
pietro giromini
 

Open architecture competitions

  • Closest Deadline first
  • Project competitions first
    Selected winning projects have the potential to be constructed
  • Ideas competitions first
    Experimental competitions with the focus on pushing the boundaries of creativity
ideas COMPETITION
The Architect's Chair
Edition #1

Take a seat and make a statement!

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 06
Sep 06
Nov 01
ideas COMPETITION
Beyond Isolation: Senior Housing
Senior living. Edition#2

Reimagine senior living spaces

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 08
Sep 08
Nov 02
project COMPETITION
The Legendary Highway 14 Tower
South Dakota, USA

Design an iconic tower for De Smet, South Dakota, USA

Prize: MONETARY AWARD + POTENTIAL TO BE REALISED
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 09
Sep 12
Nov 03
project COMPETITION
Iceland Beer Spa

Design a beer spa in Iceland's captivating landscape

Prize: MONETARY AWARD + POTENTIAL TO BE REALISED
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 14
Sep 14
Nov 08

Reccuring architecture competitions

ideas COMPETITION
Silent contest
For this competition, NO DESCRIPTION TEXT is allowed. The architecture ideas must be communicated strictly with visuals.
Museum of Emotions
Edition #4

Use architecture to create different emotional states

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Sep 27
Nov 28
Jan 30
ideas COMPETITION
Silent contest
For this competition, NO DESCRIPTION TEXT is allowed. The architecture ideas must be communicated strictly with visuals.
The Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial
Edition #3

Design a memorial that speaks to the cause of ending all nuclear weapons programs

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 26
Sep 03
Nov 05
ideas COMPETITION
Workplace Reimagined
Edition #3

Redefine the future of workspaces

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Sep 14
Nov 16
Jan 18
Run repeatedly
Los Angeles Affordable Housing Challenge
Affordable Housing Series #16

Design affordable housing solutions in Los Angeles

Prize: MONETARY AWARD
Eligibility: OPEN TO ALL

registration deadlines

Remind me
Jun 07
Sep 07
Nov 01
Register now

Please enter your email address to receive download link

Thank you!

The download link will be sent to your email shortly

please check the spam folder
in case you can not find it
OK

Competition results

MICROHOME

MICROHOME

Small living, huge impact! Edition #4
Hong Kong 
Pixel Homes

Hong Kong Pixel Homes

Affordable Housing Series #2
To access competion downloads please enter your email address:
OK
To access competion downloads please enter your email address:
OK
This website uses cookies for enhancing the user experience and tracking usage statistics.
More information is available in our Privacy Policy.