Introduction

COMPETITION ORGANISERS
Los Angeles Affordable 
Housing Challenge

Buildner is excited to announce the results of the Los Angeles Affordable Housing Challenge! 

The Los Angeles Affordable Housing Challenge is the 16th installment of Buildner's affordable housing competition series. It welcomed architects and design enthusiasts from around the globe to submit inventive solutions to tackle Los Angeles' housing crisis. The competition was hosted in partnership with ARCHHIVE BOOKS, and tasked participants with proposing a flexible, innovative, pilot-phase concept for affordable housing within Greater Los Angeles.

Buildner’s Affordable Housing design series posits that there is no one right answer to making housing affordable. Today, a host of new ideas and platforms are enabling people to own or purchase homes. These creative methods include everything from community co-living facilities, to 3D-printed homes, stackable modular homes, new zoning policies and new forms of transit-oriented development.

As Los Angeles grapples with skyrocketing rents, gentrification, and expensive starter homes, affordable housing for lower-income households has become increasingly scarce. This competition tasked participants with proposing design-related solutions to the city’s housing crisis. They were encouraged to submit flexible solutions to accommodate a range of unit sizes including families, single professionals, and couples. There was no set competition site or scale, and participants were encouraged to be as creative as possible. The jury sought projects that challenge typical ideas of housing, design, and the community at large, while at the same time maintaining a practical element that could potentially see these designs realized.

Buildner collaborated with a regional and international interdisciplinary jury panel: Persis Lam is an associate at Toronto-based Diamond Schmitt Architects as well as executive member of Building Equality in Architecture Toronto (BEAT); Dr. Steffen Lehmann is a tenured full Professor of Architecture and former Executive Director of schools of architecture, including the UNLV School of Architecture in Las Vegas; Christina Lennox is the Cofounder and Chief Product Officer of Brownstone, a shared housing company which makes sleeping pods that transform existing homes into affordable shared living arrangements; Maya Mahgoub-Desai is the Chair of Environmental Design at OCAD University and a practicing Urban Designer and Planner with Moriyama Teshima Architects whose research focuses on public health;  Fotini Pitoglou is a licensed architect in Ontario, Canada, the UK and Greece and a lead architect on hospitality projects at Toronto-based FORREC as well as an executive member of Building Equality in Architecture Toronto; Caitlin J. Saladino serves as the Director of Strategic Development at The Lincy Institute and Brookings Mountain West, a public policy think tank focused on improving health, education, economic development, governance, non-profits, and social services in Nevada; Yimeng Teng is a project architect at Ro Rockett Design, an award winning design firm based in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Aspen; and Katrina Yin, AIA, is an architect and design manager at JDS Development Group in New York City.

Buildner and its jury panel thank all individuals and teams that submitted proposals.

We sincerely thank our jury panel
for their time and expertise

Maya Mahgoub-Desai

Chair of Environmental Design, OCAD University

Canada

Persis Lam

Associate Architect, Diamond Schmitt Architects

Canada

Dr. Steffen Lehmann

UNLV School of Architecture

USA

Christina Lennox

Cofounder and Chief Product Officer of Brownstone

USA

Fotini Pitoglou

Architect, FORREC

Canada

Dr. Caitlin J. Saladino

Director of Strategic Development at The Lincy Institute and Brookings Mountain West

USA

Yimeng Teng

architect at Ro Rockett Design

USA

Katrina Yin

architect and design manager at JDS Development Group

USA

Enter the next competition edition
Denver 
Single-Stair 
Housing Challenge

Design single staircase, multi-story residential housing in Denver

Affordable Housing Series 18th Edition ideas COMPETITION

1st Prize Winner

Project name

Remedy Towers

Participating in competitions provides opportunities to expand our knowledge on subjects we may not have access to in our practical work. We always approach competitions by questioning our preconceptions of design while still keeping constraints and feasibility in mind, which has allowed us to both grow our knowledge and reshape the ways we design in our day to day work.

Read full interview
Authors
Jihoon Kim
Brenna Elise Fransen
Country
United States
  • 9/10 Linework
  • 10/10 Quality of drawings
  • 10/10 Balance of color
  • 9/10 Layout
  • 9/10 Hierarchy
  • 7/10 Annotation
  • 8/10 Text
  • 9/10 Clarity of story
  • 9/10 Clarity of diagrams
  • 9/10 Quality of overall presentation

2nd Prize Winner +
Buildner Student Award

Project name

Housing Textures

As a recent graduate, architecture competitions help me to test my approach and design solutions in a realistic notion. It gives me confidence and positivity in my design process and approach that gives a strong guideline for future works.

Read full interview
Author
Harshwardhan Jitendra Kotwal
Country
Australia
+142 points Buildner University Rankings
  • 10/10 Linework
  • 9/10 Quality of drawings
  • 10/10 Balance of color
  • 9/10 Layout
  • 9/10 Hierarchy
  • 8/10 Annotation
  • 8/10 Text
  • 9/10 Clarity of story
  • 9/10 Clarity of diagrams
  • 9/10 Quality of overall presentation

3rd Prize Winner

Project name

Thrive Revive Unite

For us, participating in architecture competitions offers the opportunity to approach design in a less typical manner. The guidelines and requirements for competition projects often allow us to think outside the box, which greatly aids in creating increasingly innovative work. As students, it's important for us to showcase our projects beyond the university setting. Both the chance to receive feedback on our designs from industry specialists and the opportunity to win various awards are additional reasons for us to participate in competitions.

Read full interview
  • 9/10 Linework
  • 10/10 Quality of drawings
  • 10/10 Balance of color
  • 9/10 Layout
  • 9/10 Hierarchy
  • 6/10 Annotation
  • 8/10 Text
  • 9/10 Clarity of story
  • 9/10 Clarity of diagrams
  • 9/10 Quality of overall presentation

Buildner Sustainability Award

Project name

Community Energizer

Architectural competitions offer a framework for testing ideas. The potentialities of this process catalyze personal growth via the continuous design dialogue found therein, and thus shape new perspectives on evolving creative pursuits.

Read full interview
Author
Madalyn Grace Asker
Country
United States
  • 7/10 Linework
  • 7/10 Quality of drawings
  • 8/10 Balance of color
  • 6/10 Layout
  • 7/10 Hierarchy
  • 7/10 Annotation
  • 7/10 Text
  • 7/10 Clarity of story
  • 7/10 Clarity of diagrams
  • 7/10 Quality of overall presentation

Honorable Mentions

Show Honorables Mentions (6 of 6) Hide Honorables Mentions projects
Project name

Architecture of the Fifth Ecology

Architecture competitions of this nature allow anyone to challenge and provide a fresh approach to existing design dogmas. It is an incredible chance to step away from the conventional means of execution and present a different perspective to a broader audience. It helps to facilitate change in the profession through exposure and discussion, as well as one’s own professional growth. Competitions are a great venue for experimentation, and a laboratory to unpack and test design philosophies.

Read full interview
Author
Chang Yuan Max Hsu
Country
United States
Project name

Courtyard Block LA: A denser, greener, and more vibrant residential block

We see architecture competitions as a way to work on important questions that may not be sanctioned in a commissioned project. Therefore, we see ideas competitions as a small but critical part of a larger project with many inputs and outputs, and additional sources of support.

Read full interview
Authors
De Peter Yi
Heather Kate Cheng
Peter Loayza Velasque
Country
United States
Project name

Depot [+] Living

Competitions occupy the middle ground between a rather wide disjunction between design school and practice, it simultaneously offers autonomy to individual designers who generally work (and think) eclectically as a group, but also more closely simulate the design timeline of ‘conceptual to specific’ that one experiences in professional practice. On a personal level, although Yifan, Lucas, and myself are only one cohort apart each, we realized that our experiences in the same school varied differently as a result of pedagogical changes and disruptions/challenges like the pandemic – so this opportunity gave me some insight into a much more dexterous mode of working that they had to adapt into.

Read full interview
Authors
Tsz Man Nicholas Chung
Peiyu Luo
Yifan Shen
Country
Hong Kong
Project name

Symbiotic Art Promenade

This is because the contest is an opportunity to broaden one's perspective on architecture and contribute to society.

Read full interview
Authors
Dae Yeob Lee
Seon Lee
혜린 임
Jong Yun Won
Country
South Korea
+72 points Buildner University Rankings
Project name

Lives Between Buildings

Architectural competitions offer us a platform to cultivate innovative ideas rooted in contemporary issues. It is inspiring to learn from the architectural community in competitions as every participant uses different approaches to address the same prompt. All participants bring their unique expertise and past experiences into their designs, allowing us to learn from others in the field, challenge our own ideas, and develop our skill sets.

Read full interview
Authors
Ernest Che Chun Tse
Alec James Sweeting
Country
United States
+72 points Buildner University Rankings
Project name

Urban Living Framework

To test and promote urban ideas that in reality would take years to not be realised.

Read full interview
Authors
Zifeng Ye
Zixuan Xiong
Country
United Kingdom

Shortlisted projects

Show Shortlisted projects Hide Shortlisted projects

The Rack: an open source architecture

Luis Felipe Vasquez Palacios
Rodrigo Pena Macip
Gerardo Arturo SÁnchez Figueroa
Mexico

THE 5TH ECOLOGY

Raphael Ridder
Joshua Aaron Theodore Guiness
Germany

BIGBOX HOUSING

Radhakrishnan Thanjavur Ramakrishnan
Balaji Ramesh
United States

MAKERY@LA

Alexis Sanal
Ibrahim Beqiri
Faik Beqiri
Asel Işlak
Turkey

SB9 2.0

Olivia Arena

Office Of: Office

United States

ModuL.A.

Lujain Mahmoud Ismail Arabyat
Natalia ZoÉ Zambrano Bravo
Hungary

Lives Between Buildings

Ernest Che Chun Tse
Alec James Sweeting

USC - University of Southern California

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
United States

Thrive Revive Unite

Zuzanna Bucko
Alona Usychenko

Warsaw University of Technology , Politechnika Warszawska

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
Ukraine

Housing Textures

Harshwardhan Jitendra Kotwal
Australia

ACTION PLAN

Alexandra Kathlene Gray
Joseph Macglashan Iv Hill
United States

Cluster Housing

Ruth Elita Prenzler
Sarah Camille Wilder
United States

DOMEOSTASIS

Skyler Ashton Perryman
Walden Wheeler Blankenship
United States

Social Fabric

Darcia Raegan Burris
Olivia Kathryn Caban
United States

Bridging the Gap

Matthew Brady Schroeder
Robert Lloyd Iii Melton
United States

ModuScape

Wyatt Thomas Charles
Aspen Michele Regan
United States

Endless Horizons

Walter Hughes

Humphreys & Partners Architects

United States

Tubetown

Dominik Bartnik
Bartłomiej Warmiak
Julia Magdalena Kubicka

Wyższa Szkoła Ekologii i Zarządzania w Warszawie

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Poland

Community Energizer

Madalyn Grace Asker
United States

PARK & LIVE together

Maria Kinga Hofman

Warsaw University of Technology , Politechnika Warszawska

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Poland

Los Angeles Mosaic Canvas

Seyedamirhossein Zarei
Ranasadat Zarei
United States

Bridging the Highway

Wentao Guo
United States

LA city of cars

Claudio Costantino
Antonio Michele Demaio
Italy

Affordable Hollywood Dream

Yang Huang

The University of Adelaide

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Australia

Location, Connection, Revitalization | Housing Near Downtown

Henna M Gabriel
United States

Courtyard Block LA: A denser, greener, and more vibrant residential block

De Peter Yi
Heather Kate Cheng
Peter Loayza Velasque
United States

4DU LA

Jamie lyn Kleine
United States

Big Box Remix

Mackenzie Lauren Leifeste
Tracy Anne Stone
United States

Inclusive horizons

Min Jun Song
Min jae Song
Jaewoong Han

Korea National University of Transportation

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
South Korea

InnoBridges

Hyun Myung Kim
Jong Min Lee
Mo Hyunhoo
Jo Hae-won

The Korea National University of Transportation

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
South Korea

Living Lot - Urban hub Homes

Semin Tak
Jinseo Park
Seongbeom Song
Lee Gyumin

The Korea National University of Transportation

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
South Korea

Symbiotic Art Promenade

Dae Yeob Lee
Seon Lee
혜린 임
Jong Yun Won

The Korea National University of Transportation

+72 points Buildner University Rankings!
South Korea

Falling Balconies

Tizian Landt

Jade Hochschule Oldenburg, Jade University of Applied Sciences

+22 points Buildner University Rankings!
Germany

The missing corner

Giovanni David Fruttaldo

F-ARE

United States

ECO-PLEX

Shima Miabadi
Katharina Hoerath
Katie Donahue
United States

Depot [+] Living

Tsz Man Nicholas Chung
Peiyu Luo
Yifan Shen
Hong Kong

Urban Living Framework

Zifeng Ye
Zixuan Xiong
United Kingdom

Architecture of the Fifth Ecology

Chang Yuan Max Hsu
United States

District Mutation

Roberto Reitano
Leo Reitano
Italy

L.A. BABYLON

Ennio Giovanni Russo
Giovanni Cassandra
Lorenzo Russo
Italy

Remedy Towers

Jihoon Kim
Brenna Elise Fransen
United States