Foreword
Buildner is excited to announce the results of the Los Angeles Affordable Housing Challenge!
The Los Angeles Affordable Housing Challenge is the 16th installment of Buildner's affordable housing competition series. It welcomed architects and design enthusiasts from around the globe to submit inventive solutions to tackle Los Angeles' housing crisis. The competition was hosted in partnership with ARCHHIVE BOOKS, and tasked participants with proposing a flexible, innovative, pilot-phase concept for affordable housing within Greater Los Angeles.
Buildner’s Affordable Housing design series posits that there is no one right answer to making housing affordable. Today, a host of new ideas and platforms are enabling people to own or purchase homes. These creative methods include everything from community co-living facilities, to 3D-printed homes, stackable modular homes, new zoning policies and new forms of transit-oriented development.
As Los Angeles grapples with skyrocketing rents, gentrification, and expensive starter homes, affordable housing for lower-income households has become increasingly scarce. This competition tasked participants with proposing design-related solutions to the city’s housing crisis. They were encouraged to submit flexible solutions to accommodate a range of unit sizes including families, single professionals, and couples. There was no set competition site or scale, and participants were encouraged to be as creative as possible. The jury sought projects that challenge typical ideas of housing, design, and the community at large, while at the same time maintaining a practical element that could potentially see these designs realized.
Buildner collaborated with a regional and international interdisciplinary jury panel: Persis Lam is an associate at Toronto-based Diamond Schmitt Architects as well as executive member of Building Equality in Architecture Toronto (BEAT); Dr. Steffen Lehmann is a tenured full Professor of Architecture and former Executive Director of schools of architecture, including the UNLV School of Architecture in Las Vegas; Christina Lennox is the Cofounder and Chief Product Officer of Brownstone, a shared housing company which makes sleeping pods that transform existing homes into affordable shared living arrangements; Maya Mahgoub-Desai is the Chair of Environmental Design at OCAD University and a practicing Urban Designer and Planner with Moriyama Teshima Architects whose research focuses on public health; Fotini Pitoglou is a licensed architect in Ontario, Canada, the UK and Greece and a lead architect on hospitality projects at Toronto-based FORREC as well as an executive member of Building Equality in Architecture Toronto; Caitlin J. Saladino serves as the Director of Strategic Development at The Lincy Institute and Brookings Mountain West, a public policy think tank focused on improving health, education, economic development, governance, non-profits, and social services in Nevada; Yimeng Teng is a project architect at Ro Rockett Design, an award winning design firm based in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Aspen; and Katrina Yin, AIA, is an architect and design manager at JDS Development Group in New York City.
Buildner and its jury panel thank all individuals and teams that submitted proposals.
1st Prize Winner
Remedy Towers
Participating in competitions provides opportunities to expand our knowledge on subjects we may not have access to in our practical work. We always approach competitions by questioning our preconceptions of design while still keeping constraints and feasibility in mind, which has allowed us to both grow our knowledge and reshape the ways we design in our day to day work.
Read full interviewJury feedback summary
The Builder's Remedy, also known as the "Zoning Holiday, is a provision that enables California affordable housing projects to bypass a city's zoning laws if the city fails to plan for housing demands. With many regions in Los Angeles not meeting state housing requirements, designers are now afforded opportunities to conceive of affordable housing without the usual constraints associated with strict residential zones. The project proposes a series of towers that challenge height limitations and draw inspiration from the scattered palm trees found throughout Greater Los Angeles, yielding a new typology that redefines the city skyline.
Buildner's commentary, recommendations and techniques review
Order your review hereThe single-sheet entry successfully communicates both an urban and an architectural proposal as a response to a complicated brief. Its use of color on the envelope of the building typology it is suggesting is helpful not only to achieve visual balance and dynamism as part of the presentation, but it also helps communicate the colors of the city in a way that is playful and logical. Its premise of constructing thin towers to mimic the palm trees that are prevalent throughout LA is also well communicated and helps the presentation to find clean proportions. The primary criticism for this sheet is that the text is small and dense and the author is advised to consider replacing some of the body text as annotation directly on the imagery, as a means to clarifying some key points and maintaining more legible readings.
2nd Prize Winner +
Buildner Student Award
Buildner Student Award
Housing Textures
As a recent graduate, architecture competitions help me to test my approach and design solutions in a realistic notion. It gives me confidence and positivity in my design process and approach that gives a strong guideline for future works.
Read full interviewJury feedback summary
Housing Textures is situated in a diverse low-density neighborhood in a diverse fashion district of Los Angeles. New housing makes use of existing roof car parking structures. The proposal is phased and divided into segments based on private investments on individual sites, yet all connected to a shared circulation path fitted with greenery and communal spaces. It targets young adults and envisions a new means to home ownership among this demographic which is challenged by affordability.
Buildner's commentary, recommendations and techniques review
Order your review hereThe project has found a way to have it all, offering urban-scale sections, elevations and plans in addition to high-quality renderings and a detailed section that proves the project to be a sophisticated architectural proposal that has considered urban problems as well as materials and constructability. As is common in these single-sheet presentations, the text is far too small, lengthy and dense, as are the detail section annotations, to make for simple reading. It is suggested that the author reduce both the descriptive text and sectional annotation by half. Both the plan and section would benefit from darker and heavier ‘cut’ lines: provide heavier borders to the building in plan and the ground line in section for clearer visual hierarchy and to allow the drawings to ‘pop’ for clarity on the page.
3rd Prize Winner
Thrive Revive Unite
For us, participating in architecture competitions offers the opportunity to approach design in a less typical manner. The guidelines and requirements for competition projects often allow us to think outside the box, which greatly aids in creating increasingly innovative work. As students, it's important for us to showcase our projects beyond the university setting. Both the chance to receive feedback on our designs from industry specialists and the opportunity to win various awards are additional reasons for us to participate in competitions.
Read full interviewJury feedback summary
The project aims to make use of underutilized spaces along the LA River, specifically focusing on areas beneath bridges. The project aligns with the existing LA River Master Plan, which focuses on integrating bike paths and green spaces, and ‘enriches’ it with affordable housing options in this heavily industrial zone. The project proposes a modular framework to be suspended beneath existing bridge structures as a means to densify the river district.
Buildner's commentary, recommendations and techniques review
Order your review hereThe presentation finds a unique graphic style to communicate ideas using playful colors that represent key concepts. The project would benefit from an additional layer of hierarchy in several of the drawings: the section detail at the base is nearly illegible when reviewing the page as a whole and would benefit from darker lines and emphasis on select important elements; the site plan appears to be missing ‘cut’ lines that allow the reader to clearly differentiate interior from exterior, and while the use of colors and textures is bold and attractive, it appears to be missing a final layer of linework that would make the information read clearly - perhaps the use of stronger shadows at the level of the plan would be useful; and the masterplan, while important for understanding the LA region in question, and its scale and form, appears to be missing a layer of annotation to emphasize what exactly are the key points it wishes to communicate.
Buildner Sustainability Award
Community Energizer
Architectural competitions offer a framework for testing ideas. The potentialities of this process catalyze personal growth via the continuous design dialogue found therein, and thus shape new perspectives on evolving creative pursuits.
Read full interviewJury feedback summary
The project proposes a form of affordable housing connected to rideshare services and public transit lines, as a means to contribute to sustainable urban development by reducing the need for personal vehicles, easing traffic congestion, and lowering overall carbon emissions. It suggests that ‘skinny’ homes be added to streets over 60 feet wide, as a solution to constructing 500,000 new homes in LA. It aims to increase density, optimize land use, reduce commute times, and foster economic vibrancy.
Buildner's commentary, recommendations and techniques review
Order your review hereThe project is bold in its illustrative style. However, it also appears unfinished and not fully realized. The project would benefit from additional descriptive text to emphasize why and how ridesharing and skinny homes would benefit the quality of urban life and make living in LA more affordable. A regional plan would also lend to clarifying the extent of the project and its larger-scale ambitions. The project suggests it has found a solution to adding 500,000 new homes without a master plan or key data to support such a bold claim. This sort of empirical information is necessary to answer questions jurors as well as readers will certainly pose.